MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.24369

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2016

Indications, reconstructive techniques, and results for total glossectomy.

Mazarro Alejandro, de Pablo Alba, Puiggròs Carolina, Velasco M Mercedes, Saez Manel, Pamias Jorge, Bescós Coro

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The best treatment for advanced tongue tumors remains controversial. Total glossectomy with laryngeal preservation is considered a feasible option, despite its morbidity.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 12 total glossectomies with laryngeal preservation was performed in order to assess the available reconstruction techniques and analyze survival and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

One-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 58.3% and 33.3%, respectively, both dropping to 25% after 3 years. Permanent gastrostomy was necessary in 10 patients, although videofluoroscopy revealed adequate tolerance to liquids. Speech intelligibility was satisfactory in 50% of the patients and severely impaired in the remaining 50%.

CONCLUSION

Laryngeal preservation in the context of advanced tumors of the tongue without supraglottic invasion carried similar oncologic results to total glossectomy with laryngectomy, but offers a better phonatory function. However, it is usually associated with a higher gastrostomy dependency ratio. A scrupulous selection of candidates is mandatory. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E2004-E2010, 2016.

Для цитирования: Mazarro Alejandro, de Pablo Alba, Puiggròs Carolina, Velasco M Mercedes, Saez Manel, Pamias Jorge, Bescós Coro. Indications, reconstructive techniques, and results for total glossectomy.. Head & neck. 2016. DOI: 10.1002/hed.24369.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.