MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s40814-025-01608-6

Медицинская библиотека · Pilot and feasibility studies · 2025

Co-designed neck exercise (EPIC-Neck) vs usual exercise care for people with chronic non-specific neck pain: protocol for a randomised feasibility study with process evaluation.

Price Jonathan, Rushton Alison, Ives Natalie, Jolly Kate, Parmar Priti, Greaves Colin

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Clinical guidelines recommend that people with chronic non-specific neck pain self-manage symptoms with physiotherapy-led exercise. However, current exercise strategies have modest short-term effects, engagement is poor, and 48% of people continue to experience long-term and recurrent pain. Updated exercise strategies co-produced using complex intervention development frameworks are required that consider the behavioural, psychological, environmental, and technical aspects of exercise prescription and patient adherence to optimise symptom outcomes, long-term engagement, and self-management. This study tests the feasibility and acceptability of the EPIC-Neck programme ("Exercise Prescription Improved through Co-design") which is grounded in evidence and theory and was co-produced using intervention mapping principles. The aim of the EPIC-Neck programme is to optimise the short-term outcomes of and long-term engagement with neck exercise.

METHODS

This is a randomised feasibility study with process evaluation to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the EPIC-Neck programme and inform the design of a large-scale definitive trial evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the EPIC-Neck programme. A multicentre two-arm randomised controlled feasibility study aiming to recruit 45 adults with chronic non-specific neck pain will be conducted in UK NHS musculoskeletal physiotherapy departments. Recruitment will be from waiting lists and clinic advertisements. Participants will be individually randomised in 2:1 ratio to either the EPIC-Neck programme (n = 30) or usual exercise care (n = 15). The primary feasibility objective is to determine whether to continue to a large-scale definitive trial by evaluating delivery fidelity, acceptability, contamination, and rates of recruitment and retention (outcome completion at follow-up). Other feasibility objectives are to evaluate safety, define usual exercise care, refine the EPIC-Neck programme and training, and explore the demographics of people who do and do not enrol onto the study. Outcomes will be assessed by questionnaires at baseline and at 3- and 6-month post-randomisation, appointment audio-recordings, and one-to-one semi-structured interviews with participants receiving the EPIC-Neck programme (n = 12-15) and physiotherapists.

DISCUSSION: This feasibility study will provide evidence of the feasibility and acceptability of the EPIC-Neck programme and guide the development of a definitive randomised controlled trial evaluating its clinical and cost-effectiveness within the NHS.

TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: ISRCTN81746901.

Для цитирования: Price Jonathan, Rushton Alison, Ives Natalie, Jolly Kate, Parmar Priti, Greaves Colin. Co-designed neck exercise (EPIC-Neck) vs usual exercise care for people with chronic non-specific neck pain: protocol for a randomised feasibility study with process evaluation.. Pilot and feasibility studies. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-025-01608-6.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.