The British journal of clinical practice · 1990
Cholecystostomy: a safe alternative?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hawkyard S J, Walker S J, Holt S
Аннотация
We have studied retrospectively 27 patients undergoing cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis over the past decade. The mean age of the patients was 60 years, and 17 were female. 'Difficult dissection' was the reason given for cholecystostomy in 18 cases and in the remainder the patients were deemed unfit for cholecystectomy. An operative cholangiogram was performed in only two cases, and none of the patients had a primary common bile duct exploration. Post-operative cholangiograms in 14 patients revealed common bile duct stones in three (21%). Three elderly patients (mean age 79) died in hospital. At a mean follow-up of one year, 26% of patients had come to elective cholecystectomy, and there had been a further three unrelated deaths. We conclude that under difficult circumstances, cholecystostomy may be a safe alternative to cholecystectomy. These patients have a high incidence of choledocholithiasis, and thus we would recommend operative cholangiograms in all patients. However, early ERCP and sphincterotomy may be a safe alternative if this service becomes more widely available.