Annals of nutrition & metabolism · 2024
Efficacy and Safety of Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 Analogues for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dolovitsch de Oliveira Fabiana, Khalil Samira Mohamad, Sato Emmily Daiane Buarque de Santana, de Souza Matheus Henrique Gonçalves, Meine Gilmara Coelho
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) analogues may benefit patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of FGF21 analogues versus placebo for treating patients with MASH in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Primary outcomes were fibrosis improvement ≥1 stage without worsening of MASH and MASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis. Secondary outcomes were relative reduction ≥30% of the hepatic fat fraction (HFF) measured by magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) and adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS: We included 7 RCTs (886 patients). FGF21 analogues had a higher probability of fibrosis improvement ≥1 stage without worsening of MASH (RR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.07, 2.22), MASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis (RR: 3.31; 95% CI: 1.80, 6.06), and reduction ≥30% in the HFF by MRI-PDFF (RR: 3.03; 95% CI: 2.12, 4.33) than placebo, without significant difference in the risk of AEs. Subgroup analyses by the stage of fibrosis showed that FGF21 analogues improved fibrosis only among patients with fibrosis stages F1-F3.
CONCLUSION: FGF21 analogues appear to be an effective and safe treatment option for patients with MASH, although the impact on fibrosis improvement may be limited to non-cirrhotic patients.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Primary outcomes were fibrosis improvement ≥1 stage without worsening of MASH and MASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis. Secondary outcomes were relative reduction ≥30% of the hepatic fat fraction (HFF) measured by magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) and adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS: We included 7 RCTs (886 patients). FGF21 analogues had a higher probability of fibrosis improvement ≥1 stage without worsening of MASH (RR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.07, 2.22), MASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis (RR: 3.31; 95% CI: 1.80, 6.06), and reduction ≥30% in the HFF by MRI-PDFF (RR: 3.03; 95% CI: 2.12, 4.33) than placebo, without significant difference in the risk of AEs. Subgroup analyses by the stage of fibrosis showed that FGF21 analogues improved fibrosis only among patients with fibrosis stages F1-F3.
CONCLUSION: FGF21 analogues appear to be an effective and safe treatment option for patients with MASH, although the impact on fibrosis improvement may be limited to non-cirrhotic patients.