Surgical endoscopy · 2020
Does laparoscopic reoperation yield symptomatic improvements similar to those of primary laparoscopic Heller myotomy in achalasia patients?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Santes Oscar, Coss-Adame Enrique, Valdovinos Miguel A, Furuzawa-Carballeda Janette, Rodríguez-Garcés Angélica, Peralta-Figueroa Jose, Narvaez-Chavez Sofia, Olvera-Prado Hector, Clemente-Gutiérrez Uriel, Torres-Villalobos Gonzalo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy fails in approximately 3.5% to 15% of patients. Evidence of successful laparoscopic reoperation is limited to a few studies.
METHODS: This case-control study was conducted in patients who underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy reoperation (LHM-R) from 2008 to 2016. The operative outcomes, preoperative and last follow-up manometric parameters, and symptom questionnaire results, including the Eckardt, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) and eating assessment tool (EAT-10) scores, were obtained. The data were compared with those of patients who underwent primary laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM-1).
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients who underwent LHM-R and 35 patients who underwent LHM-1 were included. The reasons for failure in the LHM-R patient group included incomplete myotomy (71.4%), myotomy fibrosis (25.7%) and structural alterations in fundoplication (2.9%). The follow-up duration was 34 months for the LHM-R group and 24 months for the LHM-1 group (p = 0.557). The procedure was performed by laparoscopy in 100% of the patients in the two groups. No differences were found regarding surgical morbidity (11.4% LHM-R vs. 2.9% LHM-1, p = 0.164). The symptomatic outcomes were equivalent between groups (Eckardt p = 0.063, EAT-10 p = 0.166, GERD-HRQL p = 0.075). An IRP < 15 mmHg was achieved in 100% of the LHM-R and LHM-1 patients. At the last follow-up, 82.1% of the LHM-R patients and 91.4% of the LHM-1 patients were in symptomatic remission (p = 0.271).
CONCLUSION: The results achieved with LHM-R are similar to those achieved with LHM-1. Laparoscopic reoperation should be considered an effective and safe treatment after a failed Heller myotomy.
METHODS: This case-control study was conducted in patients who underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy reoperation (LHM-R) from 2008 to 2016. The operative outcomes, preoperative and last follow-up manometric parameters, and symptom questionnaire results, including the Eckardt, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) and eating assessment tool (EAT-10) scores, were obtained. The data were compared with those of patients who underwent primary laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM-1).
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients who underwent LHM-R and 35 patients who underwent LHM-1 were included. The reasons for failure in the LHM-R patient group included incomplete myotomy (71.4%), myotomy fibrosis (25.7%) and structural alterations in fundoplication (2.9%). The follow-up duration was 34 months for the LHM-R group and 24 months for the LHM-1 group (p = 0.557). The procedure was performed by laparoscopy in 100% of the patients in the two groups. No differences were found regarding surgical morbidity (11.4% LHM-R vs. 2.9% LHM-1, p = 0.164). The symptomatic outcomes were equivalent between groups (Eckardt p = 0.063, EAT-10 p = 0.166, GERD-HRQL p = 0.075). An IRP < 15 mmHg was achieved in 100% of the LHM-R and LHM-1 patients. At the last follow-up, 82.1% of the LHM-R patients and 91.4% of the LHM-1 patients were in symptomatic remission (p = 0.271).
CONCLUSION: The results achieved with LHM-R are similar to those achieved with LHM-1. Laparoscopic reoperation should be considered an effective and safe treatment after a failed Heller myotomy.