Clinical characteristics and management of iodine contrast media-related anaphylactic shock during cardiac catheterization.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and impact of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) implantation on the prognosis of patients with anaphylactic shock (AS) during cardiac catheterization.

METHODS

We analyzed the medical records of 34 patients who had AS caused by iodine contrast media (ICM) between January 2009 and December 2019. Clinical features and treatments were analyzed, and patients were categorized into survival and dead groups. In addition, the patients were further divided into IABP and non-IABP (NIABP) groups to assess the impact on AS according to whether a IABP was used or not.

RESULTS

Of the 417,938 patients in whom ICM was used, 34 with AS were monitored. The prevalence of AS was 0.008%. Among the 34 patients, 6 (0.001%) died from fatal anaphylactic reactions accompanying shock, 26 (76.5%) had hypotension as the first presentation of AS in the survival and dead groups (78.6% and 66.7%, respectively), and 5 (14.7%) had unconsciousness at the initial onset of AS. The subgroup analysis revealed a higher mortality in the IABP group than in the NIABP (4/9, 44.4% vs. 2/25, 8%; P = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests a low prevalence of ICM-related AS. Hypotension was more frequent in AS related to ICM, and unconsciousness at the initial onset of AS implied a poor prognosis. The use of an IABP did not improve the outcome of the patients with AS. IABP implantation should not be used as a routine treatment for patients with AS.