Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2026
Safety and Outcomes of Intracardiac Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for Left Atrial Appendage Closure in the Very Elderly: Propensity Score Matched Real-World Outcomes From a Large US Network.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sawalha Khalid, Abughazaleh Saeed, Gobeil Kyle, Fox Marshal, Rozen Guy, Heist E Kevin, Chalhoub Fadi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is increasingly used to guide left atrial appendage occlusion as an alternative to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), particularly in elderly patients for whom general anesthesia may pose additional risks. Real-world comparative safety data in older adults remain limited, with prior studies including only small ICE cohorts. We aimed to compare short- and long-term outcomes of ICE- versus TEE-guided left atrial appendage occlusion in adults aged ≥80 years.
METHODS: We queried the TriNetX US Collaborative Network to identify patients aged ≥80 years with atrial fibrillation who underwent percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion from 2015 to 2025. Patients were stratified by imaging modality: ICE- versus TEE-guided approach. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed across demographics and comorbidities, yielding 2913 patients per group. Outcomes were assessed from the index procedure through 7 days, 90 days, and 1 year using Cox proportional hazards models to generate hazard ratios with 95% CIs. Outcomes included mortality, stroke, device thrombosis, pericardial effusion, pericardiocentesis, tamponade, and device leak.
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were well balanced after matching, with a mean age of 83 years and 44% women. At 90 days, ICE and TEE demonstrated no significant differences in mortality (hazard ratio, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.81-1.73]), stroke, device thrombosis, pericardial effusion, pericardiocentesis, tamponade, or device leak. At 1-year follow-up, mortality (hazard ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.76-1.13]), stroke, and device thrombosis remained similar between groups. However, ICE was associated with a higher incidence of device leak compared with TEE (hazard ratio, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.11-2.97]).
CONCLUSIONS: In this large propensity-matched cohort of very elderly patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion, ICE and TEE demonstrated comparable rates of mortality, stroke, and device thrombosis at 90 days and 1 year. ICE was associated with a higher rate of device leak at 1 year, warranting careful procedural technique and follow-up surveillance. Prospective studies are needed to define optimal intraprocedural imaging strategies in this high-risk population.
METHODS: We queried the TriNetX US Collaborative Network to identify patients aged ≥80 years with atrial fibrillation who underwent percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion from 2015 to 2025. Patients were stratified by imaging modality: ICE- versus TEE-guided approach. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed across demographics and comorbidities, yielding 2913 patients per group. Outcomes were assessed from the index procedure through 7 days, 90 days, and 1 year using Cox proportional hazards models to generate hazard ratios with 95% CIs. Outcomes included mortality, stroke, device thrombosis, pericardial effusion, pericardiocentesis, tamponade, and device leak.
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were well balanced after matching, with a mean age of 83 years and 44% women. At 90 days, ICE and TEE demonstrated no significant differences in mortality (hazard ratio, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.81-1.73]), stroke, device thrombosis, pericardial effusion, pericardiocentesis, tamponade, or device leak. At 1-year follow-up, mortality (hazard ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.76-1.13]), stroke, and device thrombosis remained similar between groups. However, ICE was associated with a higher incidence of device leak compared with TEE (hazard ratio, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.11-2.97]).
CONCLUSIONS: In this large propensity-matched cohort of very elderly patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion, ICE and TEE demonstrated comparable rates of mortality, stroke, and device thrombosis at 90 days and 1 year. ICE was associated with a higher rate of device leak at 1 year, warranting careful procedural technique and follow-up surveillance. Prospective studies are needed to define optimal intraprocedural imaging strategies in this high-risk population.