La Radiologia medica · 2023
Evaluation the benefits of additional radiotherapy for gastric cancer patients after D2 resection using CT based radiomics.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zheng Haoze, Zheng Qiao, Jiang Mengmeng, Chen Didi, Han Ce, Yi Jinling, Ai Yao, Yan Jingyi, Jin Xiance
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The value of adding radiotherapy (RT) is still unclear for patients with gastric cancer (GC) after D2 lymphadenectomy. The purpose of this study is to predict and compare the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of GC patients treated by chemotherapy and chemoradiation based on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) radiomics.
METHODS: A total of 154 patients treated by chemotherapy and chemoradiation in authors' hospital were retrospectively reviewed and randomly divided into the training and testing cohorts (7:3). Radiomics features were extracted from contoured tumor volumes in CECT using the pyradiomics software. Radiomics score and nomogram with integrated clinical factors were developed to predict the OS and DFS and evaluated with Harrell's Consistency Index (C-index).
RESULTS: Radiomics score achieved a C index of 0.721(95%CI: 0.681-0.761) and 0.774 (95%CI: 0.738-0.810) in the prediction of DFS and OS for GC patients treated by chemotherapy and chemoradiation, respectively. The benefits of additional RT only demonstrated in subgroup of GC patients with Lauren intestinal type and perineural invasion (PNI). Integrating clinical factors further improved the prediction ability of radiomics models with a C-index of 0.773 (95%CI: 0.736-0.810) and 0.802 (95%CI: 0.765-0.839) for DFS and OS, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: CECT based radiomics is feasible to predict the OS and DFS for GC patients underwent chemotherapy and chemoradiation after D2 resection. The benefits of additional RT only observed in GC patients with intestinal cancer and PNI.
METHODS: A total of 154 patients treated by chemotherapy and chemoradiation in authors' hospital were retrospectively reviewed and randomly divided into the training and testing cohorts (7:3). Radiomics features were extracted from contoured tumor volumes in CECT using the pyradiomics software. Radiomics score and nomogram with integrated clinical factors were developed to predict the OS and DFS and evaluated with Harrell's Consistency Index (C-index).
RESULTS: Radiomics score achieved a C index of 0.721(95%CI: 0.681-0.761) and 0.774 (95%CI: 0.738-0.810) in the prediction of DFS and OS for GC patients treated by chemotherapy and chemoradiation, respectively. The benefits of additional RT only demonstrated in subgroup of GC patients with Lauren intestinal type and perineural invasion (PNI). Integrating clinical factors further improved the prediction ability of radiomics models with a C-index of 0.773 (95%CI: 0.736-0.810) and 0.802 (95%CI: 0.765-0.839) for DFS and OS, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: CECT based radiomics is feasible to predict the OS and DFS for GC patients underwent chemotherapy and chemoradiation after D2 resection. The benefits of additional RT only observed in GC patients with intestinal cancer and PNI.