MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of urology · 1995

The long-term urological response of neonates with myelodysplasia treated proactively with intermittent catheterization and anticholinergic therapy.

Edelstein R A, Bauer S B, Kelly M D, Darbey M M, Peters C A, Atala A, Mandell J, Colodny A H, Retik A B

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Urinary tract management in children with myelodysplasia is controversial. Some advocate observation alone, while others believe that the prophylactic institution of intermittent catheterization and anticholinergic therapy may help to prevent deterioration.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A nonrandomized prospective study was instituted to compare the urological outcomes of a cohort of children who were at risk for urological deterioration on the basis of bladder-sphincter dyssynergia and/or high filling or voiding pressures. Those at risk were observed until deterioration occurred, or were placed on prophylactic intermittent catheterization with or without anticholinergic medication.

RESULTS

Of 44 children at risk 35 followed by observation alone had urinary tract deterioration, whereas only 3 of 20 at risk treated with prophylactic intermittent catheterization had deterioration with time.

CONCLUSIONS

Proactive bladder treatment significantly reduced the incidence of upper urinary tract deterioration and need for surgical intervention.

Для цитирования: Edelstein R A, Bauer S B, Kelly M D, Darbey M M, Peters C A, Atala A, Mandell J, Colodny A H, Retik A B. The long-term urological response of neonates with myelodysplasia treated proactively with intermittent catheterization and anticholinergic therapy.. The Journal of urology. 1995.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.