Intensive care medicine · 1994
Intra-abdominal pressure measurement using a modified nasogastric tube: description and validation of a new technique.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sugrue M, Buist M D, Lee A, Sanchez D J, Hillman K M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the accuracy of an intragastric method of measuring intra-abdominal pressure (IAP).
DESIGN: Prospective sequential study with simultaneous paired measurement of gastric and urinary bladder pressures.
SETTING: Operating theatre, University Teaching Hospital.
PATIENTS: 9 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were studied.
INTERVENTIONS: Intraperitoneal pressures were monitored during peritoneal insufflation at laparoscopy up to a pressure of 20 mmHg.
MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Intra-abdominal pressure measurements were recorded simultaneously using a gastric balloon and urinary catheter. Gastric pressure may be up to 4 mmHg higher or 3 mmHg lower than urinary bladder pressure.
CONCLUSIONS: Intra-abdominal pressure can be measured easily in this new fashion, allowing a continuous pressure trend to be obtained without interfering with urinary output estimation.
DESIGN: Prospective sequential study with simultaneous paired measurement of gastric and urinary bladder pressures.
SETTING: Operating theatre, University Teaching Hospital.
PATIENTS: 9 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were studied.
INTERVENTIONS: Intraperitoneal pressures were monitored during peritoneal insufflation at laparoscopy up to a pressure of 20 mmHg.
MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Intra-abdominal pressure measurements were recorded simultaneously using a gastric balloon and urinary catheter. Gastric pressure may be up to 4 mmHg higher or 3 mmHg lower than urinary bladder pressure.
CONCLUSIONS: Intra-abdominal pressure can be measured easily in this new fashion, allowing a continuous pressure trend to be obtained without interfering with urinary output estimation.