MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2020.06.018

Медицинская библиотека · Surgery · 2020

National trends and outcomes of inpatient robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Aguayo Esteban, Dobaria Vishal, Nakhla Morcos, Seo Young-Ji, Hadaya Joseph, Cho Nam Yong, Sareh Sohail, Sanaiha Yas, Benharash Peyman

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has reached nearly universal adoption in the management of gallstone-related disease. With advances in operative technology, robotic-assisted cholecystectomy has been used increasingly in many practices, but few studies have examined the adoption of robotic assistance for inpatient cholecystectomy and the temporal outcomes on a national scale. The present study aimed to identify trends in utilization, as well as outcomes and factors associated with the use of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy.

METHODS

The 2008 to 2017 database of the National Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients undergoing inpatient cholecystectomy. Independent predictors of the use of robotic assistance for cholecystectomy were identified using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

Of an estimated 3,193,697 patients undergoing cholecystectomy, 98.7% underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 1.3% robotic-assisted cholecystectomy. Rates of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy increased from 0.02% in 2008 to 3.2% in 2017 (nptrend < .001). Compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy, patients undergoing robotic-assisted cholecystectomy had a greater burden of comorbidities as measured by the Elixhauser index (2.2 vs 1.9, P < .001). Although mortality rates were similar, robotic-assisted cholecystectomy was associated with greater complication rates (15.5% vs 11.7%, P < .001), most notably gastrointestinal-related complications (3.7% vs 1.5%, P < .001). On multivariable regression, robotic-assisted cholecystectomy was associated with increased costs of hospitalization (β: $2,398, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Using the largest national database available, we found a dramatic increase in the use of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy with no difference in mortality or duration of hospital stay, but there was a statistically significant increase in complications and costs. These findings warrant further investigation.

Для цитирования: Aguayo Esteban, Dobaria Vishal, Nakhla Morcos, Seo Young-Ji, Hadaya Joseph, Cho Nam Yong, Sareh Sohail, Sanaiha Yas, Benharash Peyman. National trends and outcomes of inpatient robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy.. Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.06.018.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.