Actas urologicas espanolas · 2008
[Single center experience with Siemens Lithostar Modularis for treatment of 1500 solitiary urinary stones].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vega Vega A, de Blas Gómez V, Guerreiro González R, Gallo Rolanía F J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: the aim of the study was to evaluate the results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) treatment with Siemens Lithostar Modularis in urinary stones.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: from May 2000 until September 2006, 1500 patients, 62% men and 38% women, ages 15 to 89 years (mean age 53), underwent ESWL as treatment of urinary stones at the Lithotripsy Unit of León. Data were analized retrospectively. More than half (56%) had left urinary stones. The most frequent ureteral localization (55%) was proximal (420 patients), and the most frecuent renal was renal pelvis (345 patients). The mean stone diameter was 1.3 cm. (1.01 ureteral and 1.7 renal). All patients received ESWL-session under i.v. analgesia with alfentanil and midazolam.
RESULTS: Mean number of sessions per lithiasis was 1.5 (ureteral stones 1.4 and renal stones 1.7). The retreatment rate was 33%, 28% for ureteral stones and 39% for renal stones with a cumulative success of 86% with two sessions. 22% of the patients required auxiliary manouvers, 24% of the patients with ureteral stones and 18% of the renal stones patients. Stone free rate was 91%, 97% in ureteral stones and 82% in renal stones.
CONCLUSIONS: treatment of urinary stones with Siemens Lithostar Modularis showed good results, with a stone free patient rate of more than 90%, although 33% of the patients need multiple ESWL treatment sessions and 20% of the patient required auxiliary procedures.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: from May 2000 until September 2006, 1500 patients, 62% men and 38% women, ages 15 to 89 years (mean age 53), underwent ESWL as treatment of urinary stones at the Lithotripsy Unit of León. Data were analized retrospectively. More than half (56%) had left urinary stones. The most frequent ureteral localization (55%) was proximal (420 patients), and the most frecuent renal was renal pelvis (345 patients). The mean stone diameter was 1.3 cm. (1.01 ureteral and 1.7 renal). All patients received ESWL-session under i.v. analgesia with alfentanil and midazolam.
RESULTS: Mean number of sessions per lithiasis was 1.5 (ureteral stones 1.4 and renal stones 1.7). The retreatment rate was 33%, 28% for ureteral stones and 39% for renal stones with a cumulative success of 86% with two sessions. 22% of the patients required auxiliary manouvers, 24% of the patients with ureteral stones and 18% of the renal stones patients. Stone free rate was 91%, 97% in ureteral stones and 82% in renal stones.
CONCLUSIONS: treatment of urinary stones with Siemens Lithostar Modularis showed good results, with a stone free patient rate of more than 90%, although 33% of the patients need multiple ESWL treatment sessions and 20% of the patient required auxiliary procedures.