MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11547-007-0186-9

Медицинская библиотека · La Radiologia medica · 2007

Fluoroscopically guided retrograde replacement of ureteral stents.

Carrafiello G, Laganà D, Mangini M, Recaldini C, Dizonno M, Giorgianni A, Lumia D, Taborelli A, Cuffari S, Fugazzola C

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: We assessed the feasibility of fluoroscopically guided transurethral replacement of ureteral stents as an alternative to cystoscopy.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Over the last year, we replaced 27 double-J ureteral stents in 20 patients (10 men and 10 women; mean age 67.7 years, range 43-83); 15/20 patients had a native kidney, 3/20 had a transplanted kidney and 2/20 had a ureteroileal conduit. The procedures were performed in the angiography suite with the patient under sedation. All stents were grasped with a gooseneck snare under fluoroscopic control, and the distal end was withdrawn just outside the urethra; then a wire was advanced through the stent lumen and positioned in the renal pelvis. The stent was then removed and replaced with a new double-J stent.

RESULTS

The procedures were successful in 26/27 cases. We observed 7 cases of mild haematuria that resolved spontaneously. During follow-up (1-16 months, mean 6.7), stent obstruction occurred in 4 cases, requiring an additional retrograde replacement.

CONCLUSIONS

Transurethral fluoroscopically guided retrograde replacement of dysfunctioning ureteral stents is an effective and safe alternative to cystoscopy.

Для цитирования: Carrafiello G, Laganà D, Mangini M, Recaldini C, Dizonno M, Giorgianni A, Lumia D, Taborelli A, Cuffari S, Fugazzola C. Fluoroscopically guided retrograde replacement of ureteral stents.. La Radiologia medica. 2007. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-007-0186-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.