Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques · 2007
The influence of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal pelvic pressure in vivo.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guohua Zeng, Wen Zhong, Xun Li, Wenzhong Chen, Yongzhong He, Zhaohui He, Ming Lei, Kaijun Wu
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To inspect the renal pelvic pressure during minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) and to investigate whether the use of the 14 to 18-Fr percutaneous tract, 8/9.8-Fr rigid ureteroscope, and a perfusion with high pressure furnished for MPCNL results in high renal pelvic pressure.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 2005 and February 2006, 76 patients were selected for renal pelvic pressure measurement during MPCNL. The renal pelvic pressure was measured by a baroceptor of the invasive blood pressure channel in a MAIDRAY PM9000 monitor, which was connected to the open-ended ureteric catheter indwelled in the renal pelvis retrogradely. The computer collected the renal pelvic pressure data each second and all the data were evaluated statistically with SPSS 12.0 software.
RESULTS: During MPCNL within the 14, 16, 18, and double-16-Fr percutaneous tracts, the average renal pelvic pressures were 24.85, 16.23, 11.68, and 5.8 mm Hg, respectively. The average lasting times of renal pelvic pressure >/=30 mm Hg were 283, 96, 44, and 10 seconds, respectively. A postoperative fever >/=38 degrees C was recorded in 2 (2/12), 3 (3/30), 2 (2/21), and 1 case (1/13), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Renal pelvic pressure generally remains lower than the level required for a backflow (30 mm Hg), during MPCNL via 14 to 18-Fr percutaneous tract. Any factor, which causes bad drainage, will result in a temporarily elevated renal pelvic pressure greater than 30 mm Hg; and multiple temporary high-pressure episodes can have a cumulative effect, which means that there will be enough backflow to cause a bacteremia.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 2005 and February 2006, 76 patients were selected for renal pelvic pressure measurement during MPCNL. The renal pelvic pressure was measured by a baroceptor of the invasive blood pressure channel in a MAIDRAY PM9000 monitor, which was connected to the open-ended ureteric catheter indwelled in the renal pelvis retrogradely. The computer collected the renal pelvic pressure data each second and all the data were evaluated statistically with SPSS 12.0 software.
RESULTS: During MPCNL within the 14, 16, 18, and double-16-Fr percutaneous tracts, the average renal pelvic pressures were 24.85, 16.23, 11.68, and 5.8 mm Hg, respectively. The average lasting times of renal pelvic pressure >/=30 mm Hg were 283, 96, 44, and 10 seconds, respectively. A postoperative fever >/=38 degrees C was recorded in 2 (2/12), 3 (3/30), 2 (2/21), and 1 case (1/13), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Renal pelvic pressure generally remains lower than the level required for a backflow (30 mm Hg), during MPCNL via 14 to 18-Fr percutaneous tract. Any factor, which causes bad drainage, will result in a temporarily elevated renal pelvic pressure greater than 30 mm Hg; and multiple temporary high-pressure episodes can have a cumulative effect, which means that there will be enough backflow to cause a bacteremia.