Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde · 2025
[The role of clinical practice guidelines in the assessment by the disciplinary board].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Weller Floris S, van Bodegom-Vos Leti, Repping Sjoerd, Hamming Jaap F
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To examine how often disciplinary complaints against physicians are upheld explicitly on the grounds of deviation from clinical practice guidelines.
DESIGN: Retrospective document analysis of publicly available medical disciplinary rulings in the Netherlands between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2023.
METHODS: We analysed rulings from the official Dutch disciplinary law database (tuchtrecht.nl). All upheld complaints were reviewed to determine whether the disciplinary board explicitly cited deviation from a clinical guideline as part of its reasoning. We also collected data on the type of sanction, medical specialty, and the guideline involved.
RESULTS: Of the 1,799 rulings, 514 complaints were upheld. In only six cases (1%), deviation from a clinical guideline was explicitly mentioned as a reason for the decision. In all six cases, the deviation was neither justified nor documented in the patient's medical record.
CONCLUSION: Explicit citation of deviation from clinical practice guidelines as a reason for upholding disciplinary complaints is rare. These findings highlight the importance of proper documentation and may help reassure physicians about the professional discretion available when deviating from guidelines with well-substantiated reasoning.
DESIGN: Retrospective document analysis of publicly available medical disciplinary rulings in the Netherlands between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2023.
METHODS: We analysed rulings from the official Dutch disciplinary law database (tuchtrecht.nl). All upheld complaints were reviewed to determine whether the disciplinary board explicitly cited deviation from a clinical guideline as part of its reasoning. We also collected data on the type of sanction, medical specialty, and the guideline involved.
RESULTS: Of the 1,799 rulings, 514 complaints were upheld. In only six cases (1%), deviation from a clinical guideline was explicitly mentioned as a reason for the decision. In all six cases, the deviation was neither justified nor documented in the patient's medical record.
CONCLUSION: Explicit citation of deviation from clinical practice guidelines as a reason for upholding disciplinary complaints is rare. These findings highlight the importance of proper documentation and may help reassure physicians about the professional discretion available when deviating from guidelines with well-substantiated reasoning.