Hepato-gastroenterology · 2000
Postoperative evaluation of pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nakane Y, Akehira K, Inoue K, Iiyama H, Sato M, Masuya Y, Okumura S, Yamamichi K, Hioki K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIMS: There have been many reports proposing some advantages of pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for gastric ulcer compared to the conventional distal gastrectomy. However, it is not clear whether similar results will be obtained from the patients with early gastric cancer.
METHODOLOGY: Of 50 patients with early gastric cancer, 25 underwent pylorus-preserving gastrectomy under strict criteria and the other 25 underwent distal gastrectomy with Billroth I anastomosis by the same surgeon. The subjects were then interviewed and examined periodically to assess symptoms, food intake, body weight and serum nutritional parameters. Endoscopy and a radioisotope gastric emptying test was performed 1 year after the operation.
RESULTS: Many of the patients with pylorus-preserving gastrectomy complained of gastric fullness after meals, resulting in poor food intake; a significant between-group difference was found up to 1 year after the operation. A low incidence of reflux gastritis and slow gastric emptying were confirmed in the patients after pylorus-preserving gastrectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy has advantages over distal gastrectomy in terms of the avoidance of dumping syndrome and protection against duodeno-gastric reflux. However, more time was necessary for improved gastric fullness or food intake. Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy should be applied in younger patients with early gastric cancer expecting long survival.
METHODOLOGY: Of 50 patients with early gastric cancer, 25 underwent pylorus-preserving gastrectomy under strict criteria and the other 25 underwent distal gastrectomy with Billroth I anastomosis by the same surgeon. The subjects were then interviewed and examined periodically to assess symptoms, food intake, body weight and serum nutritional parameters. Endoscopy and a radioisotope gastric emptying test was performed 1 year after the operation.
RESULTS: Many of the patients with pylorus-preserving gastrectomy complained of gastric fullness after meals, resulting in poor food intake; a significant between-group difference was found up to 1 year after the operation. A low incidence of reflux gastritis and slow gastric emptying were confirmed in the patients after pylorus-preserving gastrectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy has advantages over distal gastrectomy in terms of the avoidance of dumping syndrome and protection against duodeno-gastric reflux. However, more time was necessary for improved gastric fullness or food intake. Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy should be applied in younger patients with early gastric cancer expecting long survival.