The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica · 1999
Laparoscopic and open operation in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Naesgaard J M, Edwin B, Reiertsen O, Trondsen E, Faerden A E, Rosseland A R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To compare the results of laparoscopic and open operations in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis.
SETTING: Central hospital, Norway.
SUBJECTS: 74 patients (36 men, 38 women, median age 69.5 years (18-86)) admitted with perforated peptic ulcers from November 1991-May 1996.
INTERVENTIONS: Suture of the ulcer, patching with the greater omentum and lavage, in 49 by open operation and 25 laparoscopically.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Duration of postoperative hospital stay, operating time, number of doses of analgesic, postoperative body temperature, complications, and mortality.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference (p = 0.0001) in median operating time: 100 minutes (range 48-160) in the laparoscopic group and 50 minutes (range 20-160) in the open group. The median hospital stay was 8 days in both groups: range 3-23 days in the laparoscopic group and 2-28 days in the open group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to median number of doses of analgesic, median body temperature, complications or mortality.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic operation for perforated peptic ulcer can be considered as safe as open operation.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis.
SETTING: Central hospital, Norway.
SUBJECTS: 74 patients (36 men, 38 women, median age 69.5 years (18-86)) admitted with perforated peptic ulcers from November 1991-May 1996.
INTERVENTIONS: Suture of the ulcer, patching with the greater omentum and lavage, in 49 by open operation and 25 laparoscopically.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Duration of postoperative hospital stay, operating time, number of doses of analgesic, postoperative body temperature, complications, and mortality.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference (p = 0.0001) in median operating time: 100 minutes (range 48-160) in the laparoscopic group and 50 minutes (range 20-160) in the open group. The median hospital stay was 8 days in both groups: range 3-23 days in the laparoscopic group and 2-28 days in the open group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to median number of doses of analgesic, median body temperature, complications or mortality.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic operation for perforated peptic ulcer can be considered as safe as open operation.