The American journal of gastroenterology · 1998
Clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer in the United States.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vakil N, Hahn B, McSorley D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Clarithromycin is a key component of several antimicrobial treatment regimens for Helicobacter pylori. Cure rates with clarithromycin-containing regimens are significantly decreased when resistance is present. Resistance develops by a point mutation in the ribosomal RNA of some organisms exposed to clarithromycin. We studied the prevalence of clarithromycin-resistant organisms in patients with duodenal ulcer in the United States from 1993-96.
METHODS: Patients with endoscopic evidence of a duodenal ulcer were studied. Gastric biopsies were cultured for H. pylori and antimicrobial sensitivity was determined by the E-test (epsilometer agar diffusion gradient).
RESULTS: In 1993-94, three of 78 patients (4%) had clarithromycin-resistant strains of H. pylori. In 1995-96, 44 of 348 patients (12.6%; p = 0.025) had resistant strains of H. pylori. Patients who had previously failed antimicrobial treatment for H. pylori accounted for much of the increase in resistant strains (25%).
CONCLUSIONS: Failed therapy with clarithromycin-based regimens is a growing cause of antimicrobial resistance in H. pylori in the United States. Whereas the overall rates of primary resistance are low, the increase in secondary resistance over a short period of time is worrisome. New treatments that prevent the emergence of resistance may be important in the future.
METHODS: Patients with endoscopic evidence of a duodenal ulcer were studied. Gastric biopsies were cultured for H. pylori and antimicrobial sensitivity was determined by the E-test (epsilometer agar diffusion gradient).
RESULTS: In 1993-94, three of 78 patients (4%) had clarithromycin-resistant strains of H. pylori. In 1995-96, 44 of 348 patients (12.6%; p = 0.025) had resistant strains of H. pylori. Patients who had previously failed antimicrobial treatment for H. pylori accounted for much of the increase in resistant strains (25%).
CONCLUSIONS: Failed therapy with clarithromycin-based regimens is a growing cause of antimicrobial resistance in H. pylori in the United States. Whereas the overall rates of primary resistance are low, the increase in secondary resistance over a short period of time is worrisome. New treatments that prevent the emergence of resistance may be important in the future.