The Anatomical record · 1998
Crown morphology, enamel distribution, and enamel structure in mouse molars.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lyngstadaas S P, Møinichen C B, Risnes S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Biomolecular research and genetic manipulations have stressed the importance of thorough knowledge of normal organ morphology. Mouse molar teeth are convenient models for studying basic interactions in organ development and morphogenesis. The aim of the present study was to provide basic information on their morphology.
METHODS: Intact and sectioned/ground molars of mice of various ages were observed with SEM.
RESULTS: Enamel-free areas (EFA) were present on cusp tips at time of eruption. The dominating structural configuration in enamel was prism decussation in inner enamel and parallel prisms in outer enamel. Prism decussation tended to be absent at cusp ridges and in the bottom of grooves. In the former location, the distinction between prisms and interprism was often obscured in the middle enamel zone due to decreased difference in orientation of their crystals. A thin layer of enamel, often aprismatic, covered the distal aspect of cusps in maxillary molars and the mesial aspect of cusps in mandibular molars. The enamel abutting on EFA was often aprismatic. Aprismatic enamel exhibited incremental lines with a periodicity of about 1 microm and was often traversed by cracks. The enamel surface was porous in the bottom of grooves. Parts of mouse molar enamel were incompletely mineralized at the time of eruption.
CONCLUSIONS: SEM is a convenient method for combined studies of crown morphology and enamel structure. Based on morphological criteria, a modification of the cusp nomenclature is proposed. Enamel thickness and structure in mouse molars show regional variations. Fundamental similarities exist between mouse molar cusps and mouse incisors. Mouse molar enamel undergoes posteruptive maturation.
METHODS: Intact and sectioned/ground molars of mice of various ages were observed with SEM.
RESULTS: Enamel-free areas (EFA) were present on cusp tips at time of eruption. The dominating structural configuration in enamel was prism decussation in inner enamel and parallel prisms in outer enamel. Prism decussation tended to be absent at cusp ridges and in the bottom of grooves. In the former location, the distinction between prisms and interprism was often obscured in the middle enamel zone due to decreased difference in orientation of their crystals. A thin layer of enamel, often aprismatic, covered the distal aspect of cusps in maxillary molars and the mesial aspect of cusps in mandibular molars. The enamel abutting on EFA was often aprismatic. Aprismatic enamel exhibited incremental lines with a periodicity of about 1 microm and was often traversed by cracks. The enamel surface was porous in the bottom of grooves. Parts of mouse molar enamel were incompletely mineralized at the time of eruption.
CONCLUSIONS: SEM is a convenient method for combined studies of crown morphology and enamel structure. Based on morphological criteria, a modification of the cusp nomenclature is proposed. Enamel thickness and structure in mouse molars show regional variations. Fundamental similarities exist between mouse molar cusps and mouse incisors. Mouse molar enamel undergoes posteruptive maturation.