American journal of ophthalmology · 2024
Scleral Thickness in Simple Versus Complex Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Imanaga Naoya, Terao Nobuhiro, Wakugawa Sorako, Miyara Yasunori, Sawaguchi Shota, Oshiro Ayano, Yamauchi Yukihide, Koizumi Hideki
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between scleral thickness and a newly developed multimodal imaging-based classification of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).
DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study.
METHODS: This study included 217 eyes of 217 patients classified as simple or complex CSC based on the established protocols. Clinical and anatomical factors were compared between the 2 types. The scleral thickness was measured at 4 locations using anterior-segment optical coherence tomography.
RESULTS: Of the 217 eyes, 167 were classified as simple CSC and 50 as complex CSC. The complex CSC group showed older age (P = .011), higher male ratio (P = .001), more bilateral involvement (P < .001), poorer visual acuity (P < .001), greater subfoveal choroidal thickness (P = .025), and higher frequency of loculation of fluid (P < .001) and ciliochoroidal effusion (P < .001) than the simple CSC group. The complex CSC group had significantly greater scleral thicknesses in the superior, temporal, inferior, and nasal directions (all P < .001) than the simple CSC group. Multivariable analysis revealed that older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.054, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.013-1.097, P < .001), male sex (OR 10.445, 95% CI 1.151-94.778, P < .001), bilateral involvement (OR 7.641, 95% CI 3.316-17.607, P < .001), and the mean value of scleral thicknesses in 4 directions (OR 1.022, 95% CI 1.012-1.032, P < .001) were significantly associated with the complex CSC.
CONCLUSIONS: Older age, male sex, bilateral involvement, and thick sclera were associated with the complex CSC. Scleral thickness seemed to determine the clinical manifestations of CSC.
DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study.
METHODS: This study included 217 eyes of 217 patients classified as simple or complex CSC based on the established protocols. Clinical and anatomical factors were compared between the 2 types. The scleral thickness was measured at 4 locations using anterior-segment optical coherence tomography.
RESULTS: Of the 217 eyes, 167 were classified as simple CSC and 50 as complex CSC. The complex CSC group showed older age (P = .011), higher male ratio (P = .001), more bilateral involvement (P < .001), poorer visual acuity (P < .001), greater subfoveal choroidal thickness (P = .025), and higher frequency of loculation of fluid (P < .001) and ciliochoroidal effusion (P < .001) than the simple CSC group. The complex CSC group had significantly greater scleral thicknesses in the superior, temporal, inferior, and nasal directions (all P < .001) than the simple CSC group. Multivariable analysis revealed that older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.054, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.013-1.097, P < .001), male sex (OR 10.445, 95% CI 1.151-94.778, P < .001), bilateral involvement (OR 7.641, 95% CI 3.316-17.607, P < .001), and the mean value of scleral thicknesses in 4 directions (OR 1.022, 95% CI 1.012-1.032, P < .001) were significantly associated with the complex CSC.
CONCLUSIONS: Older age, male sex, bilateral involvement, and thick sclera were associated with the complex CSC. Scleral thickness seemed to determine the clinical manifestations of CSC.