Journal of minimal access surgery · 2026
Comparison of short-term outcomes between totally minimally invasive and minimally invasive-assisted Billroth-II gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jiang Yuxing, Guo Yuyang, Dong Yi, Deng Meiyu, Li Gaoming, Fang Yong
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive Billroth-II distal gastrectomy is one of the most frequently recommended curative resections for patients with lower- and middle-third gastric cancer. However, the efficiency and benefits of totally minimally invasive and minimally invasive-assisted distal gastrectomy with Billroth-II anastomosis are still controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the short-term outcomes of the two surgical procedures.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted an internet search of the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Medline and Embase databases up to May 2023. The parameters related to surgical outcomes, post-operative recovery, post-operative complications and surgical stress response were subjected to subsequent statistical calculations. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to perform the meta-analysis.
RESULTS: A total of seven retrospective studies were included in this meta-analysis. No significant differences were observed in the operative time, number of anastomoses, number of retrieved lymph nodes or surgical stress response indices of white blood cells and C-reactive protein. We detected a lower estimated blood loss, a shorter incision, an earlier time to first flatus and a shorter post-operative hospital stay in patients who underwent totally minimally invasive Billroth-II distal gastrectomy.
CONCLUSION: Compared with minimally invasive-assisted Billroth-II distal gastrectomy, totally minimally invasive Billroth-II distal gastrectomy is a feasible and safe radical operation with acceptable surgical outcomes that may offer shorter post-operative recovery times.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted an internet search of the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Medline and Embase databases up to May 2023. The parameters related to surgical outcomes, post-operative recovery, post-operative complications and surgical stress response were subjected to subsequent statistical calculations. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to perform the meta-analysis.
RESULTS: A total of seven retrospective studies were included in this meta-analysis. No significant differences were observed in the operative time, number of anastomoses, number of retrieved lymph nodes or surgical stress response indices of white blood cells and C-reactive protein. We detected a lower estimated blood loss, a shorter incision, an earlier time to first flatus and a shorter post-operative hospital stay in patients who underwent totally minimally invasive Billroth-II distal gastrectomy.
CONCLUSION: Compared with minimally invasive-assisted Billroth-II distal gastrectomy, totally minimally invasive Billroth-II distal gastrectomy is a feasible and safe radical operation with acceptable surgical outcomes that may offer shorter post-operative recovery times.