MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111811

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2025

Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation and Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis showed moderate to substantial concordance in the evaluation of certainty of the evidence.

Minozzi Silvia, Cinquini Michela, Arienti Chiara, Battain Pier Carlo, Brigadoi Giulia, Del Vicario Miryam, Di Domenico Giulia, Farma Tommaso, Federico Sara, Innocenti Tiziano, La Rosa Giusy Rita Maria, Orlandi Elena, Piersanti Alessandra, Selvanetti Alberto, Zanetta Laura, Del Giovane Cinzia

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) and Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) are available to assess the confidence in network meta-analysis (NMA) results. They share common aspects, but their operationalization differs. We evaluated interrater reliability (IRR) among assessors, the approaches' concordance, and application time.

METHODS

Two dichotomous ("seizure response", "ischemic stroke") and two continuous ("change in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)", "weight loss") outcomes with networks of different sizes, structures and complexities were chosen from four NMAs. Thirteen assessors were randomly assigned to four groups to apply both GRADE and CINeMA on one continuous and one dichotomous outcome. We measured IRR and concordance using Gwet's AC on the overall evaluation and each tool's domain. We calculated time spent evaluating each network and tool, including time to consult the guidance papers.

RESULTS

IRR ranged from 0.49 ("seizure response") to 0.70 ("ischemic stroke") with GRADE, from 0.02 ("ischemic stroke") to 0.73 ("change in ADHD symptoms") with CINeMA. Overall concordance was 1, 0.90, 0.68, and 0.42 for "seizure response", "ADHD symptoms", "weight loss", and "ischemic stroke", respectively. The median time spent to assess each network ranged from 160 to 481 minutes with GRADE, from 150 to 330 minutes with CINeMA.

CONCLUSION

IRR was moderate to substantial with both approaches, except for CINeMA when applied to the largest and most complex network ("ischemic stroke"). Concordance was good for small networks with no or few indirect comparisons ("seizure response") and decreased as the number of comparisons and indirect evidence increased. Application time was long with both approaches, particularly with GRADE for large networks.

Для цитирования: Minozzi Silvia, Cinquini Michela, Arienti Chiara, Battain Pier Carlo, Brigadoi Giulia, Del Vicario Miryam, Di Domenico Giulia, Farma Tommaso, Federico Sara, Innocenti Tiziano, La Rosa Giusy Rita Maria, Orlandi Elena, Piersanti Alessandra, Selvanetti Alberto, Zanetta Laura, Del Giovane Cinzia. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation and Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis showed moderate to substantial concordance in the evaluation of certainty of the evidence.. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111811.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.