MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s2214-109x(25)00059-2

Медицинская библиотека · The Lancet. Global health · 2025

Top ten research priorities in global burns care: findings from the James Lind Alliance Global Burns Research Priority Setting Partnership.

Richards Hollie Sarah, Staruch Robert M T, Kinsella Suzannah, Savovic Jelena, Qureshi Riaz, Elliott Daisy, Rooshenas Leila, King Anni, Acton Amy, Bayuo Jonathan, Booth Simon, Chamania Shobha, Chieu Le Quoc, Coates Charlotte, Collins Declan, Deguire Lise, Dheansa Baljit, Dudley-Southern Roy, Easton Ian, Edgar Dale, Evans Janine, Falder Sian, Gonzalez Emilio, Holley Alex, Holley Catrina, Icaza Ivette L, Jowett Claire, Leaver Jane, Lee Alice, Martin Niall, Meirte Jill, Lam Nguyen Nh, Pugh Catrin, Shah Mamta, Stiles Krissie, Vehmeijer Marielle, Ahmed Tanveer, Allorto Nikki, Cinar Murat Ali, Dingle Lewis Allen, Flores Orlando, Gabriel Vincent, Ghosh Dhruv, Gondwe Jotham, Harada Teruichi, Jagnoor Jagnoor, Keshri Vikash Ranjan, Luo Goaxing, Mc Kittrick Andrea, Meyers Natalie, Pargal Pinki, Parrish Carisa, Pelchat Marie-Claude, Rezaeian Mohsen, Sanyang Edrisa, Suroy Atul, Taibi Khaled, Ait Abderrahim Leila, Vana Luiz Philipe Molina, Wang Katie, Zia Nukhba, Blazeby Jane M, Young Amber

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Burns are a global issue that can result in lifelong multimorbidities and disproportionately affect people in low-resource settings. Prioritising research of importance to patients and health-care professionals improves evidence-based care. This prioritisation setting partnership was undertaken in global burn care (focusing on thermal non-electrical burns) by establishing a James Lind Alliance research priority setting partnership. Over 2 years, two online multilingual surveys with patients, carers, and clinicians, 16 interviews, and a virtual priority setting workshop were conducted to identify and prioritise questions for research. Survey responses were received from participants in 88 countries (1617 survey one respondents; 630 survey two respondents). A short-list of 19 research priorities were ranked at an online workshop attended by 28 participants (14 health-care professionals, ten burn survivors, and four carers or advocates) from 15 countries to produce the final top ten research priorities. These priorities provide opportunities for researchers, funders, and clinicians to shape the future of burns research and improve burns care globally.

Для цитирования: Richards Hollie Sarah, Staruch Robert M T, Kinsella Suzannah, Savovic Jelena, Qureshi Riaz, Elliott Daisy, Rooshenas Leila, King Anni, Acton Amy, Bayuo Jonathan, Booth Simon, Chamania Shobha, Chieu Le Quoc, Coates Charlotte, Collins Declan, Deguire Lise, Dheansa Baljit, Dudley-Southern Roy, Easton Ian, Edgar Dale, Evans Janine, Falder Sian, Gonzalez Emilio, Holley Alex, Holley Catrina, Icaza Ivette L, Jowett Claire, Leaver Jane, Lee Alice, Martin Niall, Meirte Jill, Lam Nguyen Nh, Pugh Catrin, Shah Mamta, Stiles Krissie, Vehmeijer Marielle, Ahmed Tanveer, Allorto Nikki, Cinar Murat Ali, Dingle Lewis Allen, Flores Orlando, Gabriel Vincent, Ghosh Dhruv, Gondwe Jotham, Harada Teruichi, Jagnoor Jagnoor, Keshri Vikash Ranjan, Luo Goaxing, Mc Kittrick Andrea, Meyers Natalie, Pargal Pinki, Parrish Carisa, Pelchat Marie-Claude, Rezaeian Mohsen, Sanyang Edrisa, Suroy Atul, Taibi Khaled, Ait Abderrahim Leila, Vana Luiz Philipe Molina, Wang Katie, Zia Nukhba, Blazeby Jane M, Young Amber. Top ten research priorities in global burns care: findings from the James Lind Alliance Global Burns Research Priority Setting Partnership.. The Lancet. Global health. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(25)00059-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

HumansBurnsGlobal HealthHealth PrioritiesResearchBiomedical ResearchSurveys and Questionnaires
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.