International journal of women's health · 2026
Multiparametric Pelvic-Floor Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Staging of Anterior-Compartment Clinical Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xiong Shan, Wu Wenze, Xiao Li, Tian Dijiao, Wan Bing, Lv Furong
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the utility of multiparametric pelvic-floor magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for identifying stage III-IV anterior-compartment clinical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and guiding clinical management.
METHODS: In total, 123 women with confirmed anterior-compartment clinical POP were prospectively categorized into non-stage III-IV (n = 60) and stage III-IV (n = 63) groups. All participants underwent combined pelvic-floor static-dynamic MRI and T2 star (T2*) mapping. Levator ani muscle (LAM) injury was assessed. The perpendicular distance from the bladder base to the pubococcygeal line (B-PCL), H-line, M-line, levator hiatus area (LHA), levator plate angle, and iliococcygeal angle were measured at rest and maximum Valsalva. T2* values were measured in LAM. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were used to diagnose stage III-IV prolapse. The optimal model was compared with the conventional MRI-based "rule of three".
RESULTS: Compared with the non-stage III-IV group, the stage III-IV group was significantly older in age; had higher Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 scores; exhibited larger B-PCL, M-line, and LHA values at maximum Valsalva; and demonstrated lower pubovisceral muscle T2* values. Compared with the "rule of three", the optimal multiparametric MRI-based model achieved an area under the curve of 0.802, with significantly higher sensitivity, modestly lower specificity, and superior overall accuracy.
CONCLUSION: The multiparametric pelvic-floor MRI-based diagnostic model demonstrates superior performance in identifying stage III-IV anterior-compartment clinical POP. This model provides an objective imaging-based reference to support accurate POP staging and guide clinical management.
METHODS: In total, 123 women with confirmed anterior-compartment clinical POP were prospectively categorized into non-stage III-IV (n = 60) and stage III-IV (n = 63) groups. All participants underwent combined pelvic-floor static-dynamic MRI and T2 star (T2*) mapping. Levator ani muscle (LAM) injury was assessed. The perpendicular distance from the bladder base to the pubococcygeal line (B-PCL), H-line, M-line, levator hiatus area (LHA), levator plate angle, and iliococcygeal angle were measured at rest and maximum Valsalva. T2* values were measured in LAM. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were used to diagnose stage III-IV prolapse. The optimal model was compared with the conventional MRI-based "rule of three".
RESULTS: Compared with the non-stage III-IV group, the stage III-IV group was significantly older in age; had higher Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 scores; exhibited larger B-PCL, M-line, and LHA values at maximum Valsalva; and demonstrated lower pubovisceral muscle T2* values. Compared with the "rule of three", the optimal multiparametric MRI-based model achieved an area under the curve of 0.802, with significantly higher sensitivity, modestly lower specificity, and superior overall accuracy.
CONCLUSION: The multiparametric pelvic-floor MRI-based diagnostic model demonstrates superior performance in identifying stage III-IV anterior-compartment clinical POP. This model provides an objective imaging-based reference to support accurate POP staging and guide clinical management.