MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.005

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of endodontics · 2011

Reverse sandwich restoration for the management of invasive cervical resorption: a case report.

Vinothkumar Thilla Sekar, Tamilselvi Ramachandran, Kandaswamy Deivanayagam

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Invasive cervical resorption (ICR) may occur as a consequence of trauma, orthodontic treatment, intracoronal bleaching, and surgical procedures and may lead to the progressive and destructive loss of tooth structure. The restoration of these resorptive defects is a challenging task because no single restorative material possesses good sealing ability, reinforcement of remaining tooth structure, and biocompatibility simultaneously.

METHODS

This case presented with invasive cervical resorption class 2 (Heithersay) and apical inflammatory resorption caused by trauma in tooth #9. The surgical management of ICR was performed, and, finally, the roots were externally reinforced by filling the resorptive defect with a combination of composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement, proposed as reverse sandwich restoration (RSR).

RESULTS

This novel RSR was well tolerated by the periodontal tissues. A follow-up x-ray showed no pathological changes and no recurrence of resorption.

CONCLUSIONS

This case report presents a treatment strategy for root reinforcement that might improve the healing outcomes for patients with invasive cervical resorption.

Для цитирования: Vinothkumar Thilla Sekar, Tamilselvi Ramachandran, Kandaswamy Deivanayagam. Reverse sandwich restoration for the management of invasive cervical resorption: a case report.. Journal of endodontics. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.