MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00115-018-0604-3

Медицинская библиотека · Der Nervenarzt · 2018

[Effectiveness and tolerability of electroconvulsive therapy : Influence of clinical response from the patient's point of view].

Belz M, Besse M, Krech L, Methfessel I, Zilles D

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a highly effective, yet still controversial therapy for both the general public and psychiatrists. In this study, we investigated the patients’ view regarding effectiveness and tolerability of electroconvulsive therapy under consideration of individual clinical response.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

In 31 patients with major depression, subjective effectiveness and tolerability were assessed via a differentiated questionnaire prior to, during, and after ECT. Symptoms were rated using the Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale (MADRS) and the Beck depression inventory II (BDI-II).

RESULTS

Patients assessed ECT to be generally effective both before and after the treatment. This view was independent of their individual treatment success. In contrast, patients’ rating of individual effectiveness depended on the objective improvement of their symptoms. Side effects were rated to be generally slight to moderate.

CONCLUSION

Against the background of persisting criticism towards ECT, the viewpoint of involved patients provides us with important references for an appropriate judgement of this therapy. The results suggest a good benefit-risk ratio for ECT from the patients’ perspective.

Для цитирования: Belz M, Besse M, Krech L, Methfessel I, Zilles D. [Effectiveness and tolerability of electroconvulsive therapy : Influence of clinical response from the patient's point of view].. Der Nervenarzt. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s00115-018-0604-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.