Gastroenterologia y hepatologia · 2025
Insights into the status of the quality of nursing care in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A nationwide survey (The MAPEA Project).
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Navarro-Correal Ester, Muñoz-Gómez Diana, Rivera-Sequeiros Adriana, Murciano-Gonzalo Francisca, MAPEA Research Group
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study aimed to provide a comprehensive nationwide assessment of the status of nursing management in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
METHODS: A nationwide observational cross-sectional survey study was conducted. Nurses involved in the care of patients with IBD completed the 90-item Nursing Care Quality in IBD Assessment (NCQ-IBD) questionnaire which classifies the level of quality of care from A (highest) to D (lowest).
RESULTS: A total of 71 f questionnaires were analyzed. In this study, category A was achieved in 2 (2.8%) cases, category B in 53 (74.6%), and category C in 16 (22.5%). Of the list of 27 professional competencies identified for a specialized IBD nurse, 23 (85.2%) were met by more than 70% of participants. Regarding the presence of specific nursing IBD care only 28 (39.4%) worked for more than 4.5days/week. About 88.7% of nurses used clinical practice guidelines or protocols and 74.6% applied scales for assessing anxiety and depression, but just 18.8% and 25.4% evaluated IBD classification and activity indexes, respectively. Only 53.5% of participants reported to have available training plan in IBD. In the last 5 years, 25.4% of professionals had participated in more than five research projects, 9.9% had presented more than five communications in meetings, and 14.1% had published more than three articles.
CONCLUSIONS: Nursing care was highly satisfactory. Signage on nursing consultation doors, administrative support, holiday coverage, encouraging research, and primarily increasing the ratio of nurses working full-time, are areas for improvement.
METHODS: A nationwide observational cross-sectional survey study was conducted. Nurses involved in the care of patients with IBD completed the 90-item Nursing Care Quality in IBD Assessment (NCQ-IBD) questionnaire which classifies the level of quality of care from A (highest) to D (lowest).
RESULTS: A total of 71 f questionnaires were analyzed. In this study, category A was achieved in 2 (2.8%) cases, category B in 53 (74.6%), and category C in 16 (22.5%). Of the list of 27 professional competencies identified for a specialized IBD nurse, 23 (85.2%) were met by more than 70% of participants. Regarding the presence of specific nursing IBD care only 28 (39.4%) worked for more than 4.5days/week. About 88.7% of nurses used clinical practice guidelines or protocols and 74.6% applied scales for assessing anxiety and depression, but just 18.8% and 25.4% evaluated IBD classification and activity indexes, respectively. Only 53.5% of participants reported to have available training plan in IBD. In the last 5 years, 25.4% of professionals had participated in more than five research projects, 9.9% had presented more than five communications in meetings, and 14.1% had published more than three articles.
CONCLUSIONS: Nursing care was highly satisfactory. Signage on nursing consultation doors, administrative support, holiday coverage, encouraging research, and primarily increasing the ratio of nurses working full-time, are areas for improvement.