MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2478/jtim-2021-0003

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of translational internal medicine · 2021

Experiences on The Administration of Botulinum Toxin in Movement Disorders.

Tuğan Yıldız Buket, Tuncel Berktaş Deniz

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES

Botulinum toxin injection has been used for many years for various indications such as cervical dystonia, blepharospasm, oromandibular dystonia, hemifacial spasm in neurology. Botulinum toxin injections have been made in our clinic for about ten years. We want to report our experiences about botulinum toxin treatment in neurologic disease.

METHODS

In this study, the data of the patients receiving BoNT injection between January 2018 and December 2019 was retrospectively analyzed. Age, gender, botulinum toxin indications, and mean dose, duration of efficacy, side effects noted for each injection were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 122 patients who received botulinum toxin injections between January 2018 and December 2019. Of the 122 patients identified, 28 had cervical dystonia, 61 had HFS, 21 had blepharospasm, 4 had generalized dystonia, 1 had hemidystonia following thalamic bleeding, 1 had tardive dystonia, 4 had migraine, 1 had bruxism and 1 had both migraine and bruxism.

CONCLUSION

BoNT injection is a treatment that has been used for various indications in neurology for almost 40 years. Side effects are limited and temporary with appropriate injections. We also had a wide range of indication profiles and high numbers of patients to whom we administered the BoNT treatment.

Для цитирования: Tuğan Yıldız Buket, Tuncel Berktaş Deniz. Experiences on The Administration of Botulinum Toxin in Movement Disorders.. Journal of translational internal medicine. 2021. DOI: 10.2478/jtim-2021-0003.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.