Journal of endourology · 2026
Validation of the Symu™ Flexible Ureteroscopy Platform Based on Real-Life Pulsed Tm:YAG Lithotripsy Using Specific 3D-Printed Artificial Stones.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zorzi Federico, Chicaud Marie, Jacquemin Quentin, Koutiri Imade, Gonzalez-Gonzalez Carlos, Scilipoti Pietro, Nannola Nicola, Dupuy Corine, Kutchukian Stessy, Moretto Stefano, Berthe Laurent, Guillot-Tantay Cyrille, Traxer Olivier, Doizi Steeve, Panthier Frederic
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Simulation has become central in flexible ureteroscopy training and research; however, the lack of standardized and reproducible models limits objective performance assessment. We aimed to evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of laser lithotripsy using morphology-specific artificial stones (AS) within a standardized ex vivo platform and to assess whether the model could detect operator-dependent differences in lithotripsy performance.
METHODS: This study was conducted using AS derived from 3D-printed images of human kidney stones. Six stone volume categories (F1-F6; 250-1750 mm³) were reproduced using BegoStone® mixture with ratio of 15:4. Novice and expert surgeons performed in vitro laser lithotripsy under standardized settings. Performance metrics included ablation efficiency (AE) (mm³/J), energy consumption (J/mm³), lasing time consumption (s/mm³), and laser ablation rate (AR) (mm³/min). Results were compared with six matched in vivo reference cases. Adjusted linear models were used to evaluate the effect of operator experience.
RESULTS: In vivo lithotripsy showed a mean laser-on time of 44.9 ± 17.0 minutes, total energy delivery of 32.35 ± 12.2 kJ, AE of 0.03 ± 0.00 mm³/J, and laser AR of 21.9 ± 1.78 mm³/min, with complete stone clearance in all cases. AS experiments demonstrated shorter laser-on-time than in vivo procedures (37.4-38.3 vs 44.9 minutes, p < 0.01), lower energy delivery (26.9-27.9 vs 32.35 kJ, p < 0.01), higher AE (0.04 vs 0.03 mm³/J, p < 0.01), and higher laser AR (26.0-26.8 vs 21.9 mm³/min, p < 0.01). In unadjusted aggregated comparison, expert surgeons showed higher performances than novices, although the differences did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). Adjusted analysis showed that operator experience was significantly associated with both better AE and AR (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The standardized ex vivo platform, combining a validated simulation model with 3D-printed morphology-specific AS, provides a reliable and reproducible environment for evaluating laser lithotripsy performance, supporting the objective metrics assessment.
METHODS: This study was conducted using AS derived from 3D-printed images of human kidney stones. Six stone volume categories (F1-F6; 250-1750 mm³) were reproduced using BegoStone® mixture with ratio of 15:4. Novice and expert surgeons performed in vitro laser lithotripsy under standardized settings. Performance metrics included ablation efficiency (AE) (mm³/J), energy consumption (J/mm³), lasing time consumption (s/mm³), and laser ablation rate (AR) (mm³/min). Results were compared with six matched in vivo reference cases. Adjusted linear models were used to evaluate the effect of operator experience.
RESULTS: In vivo lithotripsy showed a mean laser-on time of 44.9 ± 17.0 minutes, total energy delivery of 32.35 ± 12.2 kJ, AE of 0.03 ± 0.00 mm³/J, and laser AR of 21.9 ± 1.78 mm³/min, with complete stone clearance in all cases. AS experiments demonstrated shorter laser-on-time than in vivo procedures (37.4-38.3 vs 44.9 minutes, p < 0.01), lower energy delivery (26.9-27.9 vs 32.35 kJ, p < 0.01), higher AE (0.04 vs 0.03 mm³/J, p < 0.01), and higher laser AR (26.0-26.8 vs 21.9 mm³/min, p < 0.01). In unadjusted aggregated comparison, expert surgeons showed higher performances than novices, although the differences did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). Adjusted analysis showed that operator experience was significantly associated with both better AE and AR (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The standardized ex vivo platform, combining a validated simulation model with 3D-printed morphology-specific AS, provides a reliable and reproducible environment for evaluating laser lithotripsy performance, supporting the objective metrics assessment.