MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jccase.2024.05.005

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cardiology cases · 2024

Fusobacterium necrophorum endocarditis with intracranial abscesses: A case report and review of the literature.

Wong Emily, Robinson Clark, Upadhyaya Parth, Chandra Alvin, Prokesch Bonnie C, Kang Minji

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: Fusobacterium species are obligate anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli that are non-spore forming. The two most common species tied to human disease are F. nucleatum and F. necrophorum. They are commensal organisms in the oropharynx, gastrointestinal tract, and genital tract of humans, but can cause invasive infections especially in the head and neck such as periodontal disease and Lemierre's syndrome. F. necrophorum is an uncommon cause of infective endocarditis. We present a case of a previously healthy male who developed F. necrophorum endocarditis with multiple sites of pyogenic abscess formation.

LEARNING

OBJECTIVE

Even among anaerobes, which account for less than 1 % of infective endocarditis (IE) cases, Fusobacterium necrophorum is rare. Specific laboratory conditions are necessary for growth, leading to delays in diagnosis. Severe disease is common given its virulence and predisposition for thrombophlebitis. While uncommon, it is crucial to maintain a degree of suspicion for Fusobacterium IE especially in individuals without prior cardiac disease whose infections were preceded by potential head and neck source.

Для цитирования: Wong Emily, Robinson Clark, Upadhyaya Parth, Chandra Alvin, Prokesch Bonnie C, Kang Minji. Fusobacterium necrophorum endocarditis with intracranial abscesses: A case report and review of the literature.. Journal of cardiology cases. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jccase.2024.05.005.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.