MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1161/jaha.125.047196

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025

Echocardiographic Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Women With Severe Aortic Stenosis: The RHEIA Trial.

Silva Iria, Alperi Alberto, Hecht Sébastien, Zanuttini Antonela, Théron Alexis, Giuliani Carlos, Camacho Benjamin, Dahou Abdellaziz, Mares Jan, Bax Jeroen, Bonaros Nikolaos, Windecker Stephan, Messika-Zeitoun David, Wesselink Wilbert, Rakova Radka, Bramlage Peter, Tchétché Didier, Eltchaninoff Hélène, Pibarot Philippe, RHEIA Trial Investigators

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

In the RHEIA (Randomized Research in Women All Comers With Aortic Stenosis) trial, the incidence of the primary end point of death, stroke, or rehospitalization at 1 year was lower with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) than with surgical aortic valve replacement. The objective of this substudy was to compare echocardiographic findings in women with severe aortic stenosis following surgical aortic valve replacement or TAVI.

METHODS

At 48 European centers, 443 women underwent randomization 1:1, and 420 were treated as randomized. Echocardiograms were available in 356 patients and were analyzed by a core laboratory.

RESULTS

Rates of or greater moderate paravalvular regurgitation was low (<1%) and similar between groups. At 30 days, TAVI was associated with higher mean transprosthetic gradient and smaller aortic valve area, but the rate of severe patient-prosthesis mismatch (3.0 versus 2.6%; P=1) was low and not different between groups. Valve hemodynamics were stable at 1 year. The rate of residual left ventricular hypertrophy (45.3 versus 28.6%; P=0.004) at 1 year was significantly higher with TAVI, whereas the rate of right ventricular systolic dysfunction (14.5 versus 40.7%; P<0.001) and evolution of cardiac damage stage (improved in 21.8 versus 18.1%; worsened in 16.8 versus 47.0%; P=0.001) were better with TAVI.

CONCLUSIONS

Among women with severe aortic stenosis, both TAVI and surgical aortic valve replacement achieve excellent valve hemodynamic results with low and similar rates of moderate or greater paravalvular regurgitation or severe patient-prosthesis mismatch. Surgical aortic valve replacement was associated with lower gradients and more pronounced regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, whereas TAVI was associated with better right ventricular systolic function and evolution of cardiac damage stage.

REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04160130; Unique Identifier: NCT04160130.

Для цитирования: Silva Iria, Alperi Alberto, Hecht Sébastien, Zanuttini Antonela, Théron Alexis, Giuliani Carlos, Camacho Benjamin, Dahou Abdellaziz, Mares Jan, Bax Jeroen, Bonaros Nikolaos, Windecker Stephan, Messika-Zeitoun David, Wesselink Wilbert, Rakova Radka, Bramlage Peter, Tchétché Didier, Eltchaninoff Hélène, Pibarot Philippe, RHEIA Trial Investigators. Echocardiographic Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Women With Severe Aortic Stenosis: The RHEIA Trial.. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2025. DOI: 10.1161/jaha.125.047196.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.