Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong) · 2013
Resemblance of valgus malalignment of the distal tibia in 15-degree craniocaudal radiographs.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
McArthur John R, Makrides Panos, Wainwright David
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To describe and quantify a radiological phenomenon where the distal tibial plafond appears in valgus malalignment in intra-operative fluoroscopy owing to 15 degrees craniocaudal angulation of the X-ray beam.
METHODS: The lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA) of 14 male and 9 female skeletally mature patients was measured by a single reviewer using 2 types of anteroposterior radiographs, in which the X-ray beam was projected at 0 (orthogonal to the ankle) and then at 15 (in a craniocaudal direction) degrees. The LDTA was the angle between the long axis of the tibia and a line drawn across the most radiodense part of the tibial plafond. The paired t-test was used to compare the LDTA of the 2 measurements.
RESULTS: The mean LDTA on the 0-degree orthogonal radiographs was 89 (range, 87-92) degrees, whereas the mean LDTA on the 15-degree craniocaudal radiographs was 79 (range, 77-81) degrees. The mean difference was 10 degrees (range, 9-12; p<0.0001). In the 15-degree craniocaudal radiographs, the ankle joint appeared to have valgus malalignment.
CONCLUSION: During intramedullary nailing of the tibia, the knee is usually flexed and the image intensifier may not swing over far enough. This can result in well-aligned reduction being incorrectly viewed as having valgus malalignment or a varus-malaligned fracture being incorrectly viewed as reduced.
METHODS: The lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA) of 14 male and 9 female skeletally mature patients was measured by a single reviewer using 2 types of anteroposterior radiographs, in which the X-ray beam was projected at 0 (orthogonal to the ankle) and then at 15 (in a craniocaudal direction) degrees. The LDTA was the angle between the long axis of the tibia and a line drawn across the most radiodense part of the tibial plafond. The paired t-test was used to compare the LDTA of the 2 measurements.
RESULTS: The mean LDTA on the 0-degree orthogonal radiographs was 89 (range, 87-92) degrees, whereas the mean LDTA on the 15-degree craniocaudal radiographs was 79 (range, 77-81) degrees. The mean difference was 10 degrees (range, 9-12; p<0.0001). In the 15-degree craniocaudal radiographs, the ankle joint appeared to have valgus malalignment.
CONCLUSION: During intramedullary nailing of the tibia, the knee is usually flexed and the image intensifier may not swing over far enough. This can result in well-aligned reduction being incorrectly viewed as having valgus malalignment or a varus-malaligned fracture being incorrectly viewed as reduced.