Implant dentistry · 2013
Ridge augmentation using customized allogenic bone blocks: proof of concept and histological findings.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schlee Markus, Rothamel Daniel
Аннотация
AIM: To evaluate handling and healing patterns of customized allogenic bone blocks for vertical and horizontal alveolar defect augmentation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2 patients, 3 combined horizontal and vertical post-foraminal mandibular defects were grafted using computer-aided design (CAD) trimmed individual block grafts, 3D-designed on preoperative computed tomography scans. After a healing period of 6 months, graft resorption was measured and bone trephines were taken in progress of implant bed preparation. Four months later, implants were restored with single crowns. Moreover, clinical and radiological implant parameters were assessed 6 and 12 months after restorative rehabilitation.
RESULTS: Uneventful healing was observed in 2 of the 3 cases. A partial exposure of 1 block after 8 weeks could be successfully treated by block reduction and application of a soft tissue graft. Histological evaluation revealed predictable bone formation within all augmented areas, and both patient satisfaction and long-term stability parameters were considered excellent.
CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that the application of individual CAD allografts supports bone formation at deficient sites with reduced patient morbidity, decreased surgery time, and high patient acceptance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2 patients, 3 combined horizontal and vertical post-foraminal mandibular defects were grafted using computer-aided design (CAD) trimmed individual block grafts, 3D-designed on preoperative computed tomography scans. After a healing period of 6 months, graft resorption was measured and bone trephines were taken in progress of implant bed preparation. Four months later, implants were restored with single crowns. Moreover, clinical and radiological implant parameters were assessed 6 and 12 months after restorative rehabilitation.
RESULTS: Uneventful healing was observed in 2 of the 3 cases. A partial exposure of 1 block after 8 weeks could be successfully treated by block reduction and application of a soft tissue graft. Histological evaluation revealed predictable bone formation within all augmented areas, and both patient satisfaction and long-term stability parameters were considered excellent.
CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that the application of individual CAD allografts supports bone formation at deficient sites with reduced patient morbidity, decreased surgery time, and high patient acceptance.