MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.02.023

Медицинская библиотека · The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery · 2015

Early experience with the medial sural artery perforator flap as an alternative to the radial forearm flap for reconstruction in the head and neck.

Nugent M, Endersby S, Kennedy M, Burns A

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap has been well-described but has yet to find popularity in the United Kingdom. We describe our early experience of its use in 6 patients and our simplified method of marking up. Flaps ranged in size from 7×4cm to 12×5.5cm, and were thin (between 4 and 10mm). Pedicles were between 11 and 14cm long, arterial diameters were 1-2mm, and venous calibres were 2-6mm. We raised 4 flaps without the use of a tourniquet and found it helpful. Straightening the leg as the popliteal fossa was approached also eased dissection. There can be 2 separate pedicles. The donor site was closed primarily in 5 cases and all flaps survived. The MSAP is easier to do than the radial artery forearm free flap (RAFFF) and is a reliable alternative with low morbidity.

Для цитирования: Nugent M, Endersby S, Kennedy M, Burns A. Early experience with the medial sural artery perforator flap as an alternative to the radial forearm flap for reconstruction in the head and neck.. The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.02.023.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.