MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf02471461

Медицинская библиотека · The Japanese journal of surgery · 1988

Emergency versus elective cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis.

Misra M C, Khanna S, Khosla A, Berry M, Kapur B M

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The present study was carried out at the Department of Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Hospital, New Delhi, between January 1982 and October 1984. Clinical diagnosis of acute cholecystitis was confirmed by ultrasound scanning or Tc99m labelled HIDA Scan. Group I (n=24) comprised patients who underwent emergency cholecystectomy while Group II (n=23) comprised patients who were managed conservatively, and had an elective cholecystectomy performed 6-12 weeks later. There was no mortality or wound infection in either group. The incidence of other complications was 8.3 per cent and 8.6 per cent in Groups I and II, respectively. Emergency cholecystectomy (Group I) reduced the total hospital stay of a patient by approximately 70 per cent and post cholecystectomy syndrome was seen in Group II patients only. We thus recommend emergency or early cholecystectomy during the acute stage of cholecystitis, as it is safe, effective and economical, provided it is done by an experienced surgeon.

Для цитирования: Misra M C, Khanna S, Khosla A, Berry M, Kapur B M. Emergency versus elective cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis.. The Japanese journal of surgery. 1988. DOI: 10.1007/bf02471461.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.