MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jogc.2023.02.006

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC · 2023

Consensus Statement No. 434: Simulation in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

Sansregret Andrée, Garber Adam, Freire-Lizama Tatiana, Monton Luis, Mueller Valerie, Papalia Nicholas, Ruiter P James A, Shore Eliane M, Suri Michelle

СтатьяConsensus StatementПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive and current overview of the evidence for the value of simulation for education, team training, patient safety, and quality improvement in obstetrics and gynaecology, to familiarize readers with principles to consider in developing a simulation program, and to provide tools and references for simulation advocates.

TARGET POPULATION: Providers working to improve health care for Canadian women and their families; patients and their families.

OUTCOMES: Simulation has been validated in the literature as contributing to positive outcomes in achieving learning objectives, maintaining individual and team competence, and enhancing patient safety. Simulation is a well-developed modality with established principles to maximize its utility and create a safe environment for simulation participants. Simulation is most effective when it involves interprofessional collaboration, institutional support, and regular repetition.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: This modality improves teamwork skills, patient outcomes, and health care spending. Upholding prescribed principles of psychological safety when implementing a simulation program minimizes harm to participants. However, simulation can be an expensive tool requiring human resources, equipment, and time.

EVIDENCE: Articles published between 2003 and 2022 were retrieved through searches of Medline and PubMed using the keywords "simulation" and "simulator." The search was limited to articles published in English and French. The articles were reviewed for their quality, relevance, and value by the SOGC Simulation Working Group. Expert opinion from relevant seminal books was also considered.

VALIDATION

METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE: All health care professionals working to improve Canadian women's health, and relevant stakeholders, including granting agencies, physician/nursing/midwifery colleges, accreditation bodies, academic centres, hospitals, and training programs.

Для цитирования: Sansregret Andrée, Garber Adam, Freire-Lizama Tatiana, Monton Luis, Mueller Valerie, Papalia Nicholas, Ruiter P James A, Shore Eliane M, Suri Michelle. Consensus Statement No. 434: Simulation in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2023.02.006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.