MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/medicina60111865

Медицинская библиотека · Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024

Anterior Colporrhaphy and Paravaginal Repair for Anterior Compartment Prolapse: A Review.

Tsui Wing Lam, Ding Dah-Ching

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Pelvic organ prolapse, particularly in the anterior compartment, is a prevalent condition that significantly impacts women's quality of life. Two common surgical approaches for managing anterior vaginal wall prolapse are anterior colporrhaphy and paravaginal repair. Anterior colporrhaphy, a traditional technique, involves the plication of weakened fascial tissues to restore support to the bladder and anterior vaginal wall. Paravaginal repair addresses lateral detachment of the anterior vaginal wall by reattaching it to its supportive structures. This review aimed to compare the indications, techniques, and outcomes between these surgical methods, discussing their efficacy, recurrence rates, and complications. Although anterior colporrhaphy is widely used, paravaginal repair may offer superior results in specific cases, particularly those involving lateral defects. The review also explored the evolution of these techniques, the role of grafts and mesh, and the potential benefits of minimally invasive approaches such as laparoscopy and robotic surgery. The goal is to provide clinicians with comprehensive insights into choosing the appropriate surgical option based on individual patient anatomy and clinical presentation, thus optimizing outcomes and minimizing recurrence.

Для цитирования: Tsui Wing Lam, Ding Dah-Ching. Anterior Colporrhaphy and Paravaginal Repair for Anterior Compartment Prolapse: A Review.. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania). 2024. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60111865.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.