MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.038

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 2008

Influence of common orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of cranial magnetic resonance images.

Elison J Matthew, Leggitt V Leroy, Thomson Matthew, Oyoyo Udo, Wycliffe N Dan

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate cranial magnetic resonance (MR) image distortion caused by various orthodontic brackets.

METHODS

Ten subjects received 5 consecutive cranial MR scans. A control scan was conducted with Essix trays (GAC International, Bohemia, NY) fitted over the maxillary and mandibular teeth. Four experimental MR scans of the head were conducted with plastic, ceramic, titanium, and stainless steel brackets incorporated into the Essix tray material. Each MR scan consisted of 4 sequences: sagittal T1-weighted spin echo (T1 sagittal), axial T2-weighted spin echo (T2 axial), gradient echo, and diffusion-weighted imaging. Three board-certified neuroradiologists examined the MR images for distortion in predetermined regions of the head.

RESULTS

The paired Wilcoxon signed rank test showed a statistically significant difference between the mean distortion scores of stainless steel brackets and the mean distortion scores of the other experimental MR scans (P <0.0001). Interrater and intrarater agreement was high (kappa statistic and associated 95% confidence intervals).

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that plastic, ceramic, and titanium brackets cause minimal distortion of cranial MR images (similar to the control). On the other hand, stainless steel brackets cause significant distortion, rendering several cranial regions nondiagnostic. Areas with the most distortion were the body of the mandible, the hard palate, the base of the tongue, the globes, the nasopharynx, and the frontal lobes. In general, the closer the stainless steel appliance was to a specific anatomic region, the greater the distortion of the MR image.

Для цитирования: Elison J Matthew, Leggitt V Leroy, Thomson Matthew, Oyoyo Udo, Wycliffe N Dan. Influence of common orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of cranial magnetic resonance images.. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.038.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.