MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/archfaci.7.6.398

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of facial plastic surgery · 2005

Distraction osteogenesis for cleft palate closure in a canine model.

Tibesar Robert J, Moore Eric J, Bite Uldis

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To assess the utility of distraction osteogenesis (DO) when applied to closure of a hard palate cleft in dogs.

METHODS

A midline hard palate cleft was created in 10 mature dogs. Two were controls and had no distraction; the other 8 dogs underwent osteotomies with installation of customized DO devices to the hard palate. After a 10-day latency, distraction commenced at 1 mm/d. After a 14-day consolidation period, the device was removed and the mucosa closed. Each dog was injected with fluorochrome labels and serially killed at 2-week intervals. Bone healing was analyzed further with traditional histologic analysis and fluorochrome labeling.

RESULTS

No serious complications occurred. Bone resorption and cleft widening occurred in both control dogs. Complete bone closure of the hard palate cleft was achieved with DO in 5 of 8 experimental dogs. Three experimental dogs had bone resorption and incomplete palatal closure.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of DO techniques in closure of a hard palate cleft in a canine model is safe and well tolerated. Furthermore, in some cases, it proved effective in achieving bony closure of the cleft. Further investigation is warranted into innovative use of DO in treating children born with cleft palate.

Для цитирования: Tibesar Robert J, Moore Eric J, Bite Uldis. Distraction osteogenesis for cleft palate closure in a canine model.. Archives of facial plastic surgery. 2005. DOI: 10.1001/archfaci.7.6.398.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.