MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.05.013

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2020

Adaptation and Validation of Reflux Symptom Index Into Kannada Language.

Nayak Priyanka Suresh, Balasubramanium Radish Kumar, Gunjawate Dhanshree R

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to translate, validate the Reflux Symptom Index in Kannada language and to compare its outcomes between normal individuals and individuals with laryngopharyngeal reflux.

STUDY

DESIGN

Cross sectional study design MATERIALS AND METHOD: : The English version of Reflux Symptom Index was translated into Kannada language using standard procedures. A total of 162 participants participated in the study, 81 with laryngopharyngeal reflux and 81 controls. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and clinical validity were calculated.

RESULTS

Results revealed that the Kannada Reflux Symptom Index exhibited an excellent internal consistency (α = 0.87). The average intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.90 and 0.92, indicating excellent test-retest reliability. Independent sample t test revealed a statistically significant difference between the total scores of both the groups, thereby exhibiting good clinical validity of RSI-K (t = 42.71, df = 158, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The Kannada Reflux Symptom Index is a reliable and valid tool for use in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux. It can be used as a quick tool to assess laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Для цитирования: Nayak Priyanka Suresh, Balasubramanium Radish Kumar, Gunjawate Dhanshree R. Adaptation and Validation of Reflux Symptom Index Into Kannada Language.. Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.05.013.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.