Long-Term Voice Outcomes After Trans-Oral Resection of Early Glottis Carcinoma.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
Survival after trans-oral laser microsurgery (TLM) for glottic carcinoma is excellent. However, the voice quality after TLM remains unclear. This study examines voice outcomes following different surgical procedures.
STUDY
DESIGN
A retrospective study of voice outcomes (GRBAS, VHI-10, CSID scores) after TLM.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
Patients undergoing TLM were studied. We collected the Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10), acoustic analysis (Cepstral Spectral Peak Prominence, CSPP score), and GRBAS rating score. These data were correlated with cancer stage and ELS (surgery type).
RESULTS
We studied 102 patients (86 males, 16 females; median age 74). There were 51 type I and 27 type Va resections. The rest underwent types II, III, IV, Vb, VI, and open vertical hemilaryngectomy surgery. The median follow-up time was 5.2 years. The median VHI-10 score was 7.5 (normal < 10). The median CSID score was 27.5 (mild = 20-40). The Average GRBAS score was G1.5, R1, B1, A0, S1.5 (mild = 1, moderate = 2). There was a correlation between the CSID score and the type of cordectomy and surgical stage. There was a statistical difference in Type I ELR resection outcomes compared with all other types in voice outcome (Cohen's d-value > 0.5).
CONCLUSIONS
Patients often rate their VHI as normal, while objective and perceptual raters rate voices after TLM as showing mild to moderate dysphonia. This low VHI score may be due to cancer survivorship. Understanding the patient experience after TLM surgery and knowing the extent of surgery on voice outcomes can help better counsel patients undergoing TLM.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.