MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Shanghai kou qiang yi xue = Shanghai journal of stomatology · 2015

[The application of ultrasonic knife in open submandibular gland surgery].

Lin Hua-Wei, Liu Qiang

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To study the value of ultrasonic knife in submandibular gland surgery.

METHODS

Randomized controlled clinical trial was adopted. Forty cases collected from October 2013 to July 2014 who underwent submandibular gland surgery were divided into experimental group and control group. All cases were operated by the same surgical team. Ultrasonic knife was used in the experimental group, while electric knife was used in the control group. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications and 24 h and 48 h postoperative drainage volume were recorded and compared between the 2 groups. SPSS 10.0 software package was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in age, gender, mass size and disease type between the 2 groups (P>0.05). With the same operative procedure, there was no significant difference in postoperative complications (P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the operation time, intraoperative blood loss and 24 h and 48 h postoperative drainage volume were significantly decreased in the experimental group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Using ultrasonic knife in submandibular gland surgery is safe and reliable, with distinct advantages over electric knife. The tissue damage is less, and postoperative complications are minimal. It is worth of wide application in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Для цитирования: Lin Hua-Wei, Liu Qiang. [The application of ultrasonic knife in open submandibular gland surgery].. Shanghai kou qiang yi xue = Shanghai journal of stomatology. 2015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.