MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.24033

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2015

Safety and efficacy of concurrent neck dissection and transoral robotic surgery.

Kucur Cuneyt, Durmus Kasim, Gun Ramazan, Old Matthew O, Agrawal Amit, Teknos Theodoros N, Ozer Enver

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The literature is scarce regarding transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with simultaneous neck dissection. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of concurrent neck dissection in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treated with TORS.

METHODS

Analysis of 113 patients with oropharyngeal SCC treated with TORS and concurrent neck dissection.

RESULTS

Six intraoperative communications between the pharynx and neck region were recognized. After pharyngeal mucosal flap advancement, 1 defect was closed primarily and another one was reinforced with acellular dermal matrix. In 1 case, submandibular gland was transposed posteriorly over the sutured defect as a support. One omohyoid and 2 digastric muscular pedicle rotation flaps were used in the remaining 3 patients for the reconstruction of pharyngeal communications. None of the patients developed postoperative pharyngocutaneous fistula.

CONCLUSION

The advantage of TORS oropharyngectomy, when compared with open approaches, is the avoidance of pharyngocutaneous fistula even in the presence of concurrent neck dissection © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E519-E523, 2016.

Для цитирования: Kucur Cuneyt, Durmus Kasim, Gun Ramazan, Old Matthew O, Agrawal Amit, Teknos Theodoros N, Ozer Enver. Safety and efficacy of concurrent neck dissection and transoral robotic surgery.. Head & neck. 2015. DOI: 10.1002/hed.24033.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.