Veterinary sciences · 2025
Efficacy of a Standardized Low-Dose Insulin Infusion Protocol in the Emergency Stabilization of Diabetic Dogs.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
González Franco, Díaz Felipe, Pereira Ismael, Siel Daniela
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Continuous insulin infusion protocols are essential for managing decompensated diabetic dogs, but comparative data between variable and fixed infusion rates are limited.
METHODS: This prospective observational study evaluated the glycemic response of 21 diabetic dogs treated with a fixed-dose continuous-rate infusion (CRI) of regular insulin at 0.05 IU/kg/h for 12 h. Capillary blood glucose was measured hourly. Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Friedman test, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests.
RESULTS: A significant reduction in glucose concentration occurred during the first five hours of infusion (p < 0.0001), followed by a stabilization phase with no further significant changes. No differences in glycemic response were found by sex or breed. The protocol was well tolerated, with no hypoglycemic events observed.
CONCLUSIONS: A fixed-dose CRI of 0.05 IU/kg/h offers a safe and effective option for acute glycemic control in diabetic dogs, including those with early ketoacidosis. The standardized approach simplifies management without compromising efficacy and supports its inclusion in emergency treatment protocols.
METHODS: This prospective observational study evaluated the glycemic response of 21 diabetic dogs treated with a fixed-dose continuous-rate infusion (CRI) of regular insulin at 0.05 IU/kg/h for 12 h. Capillary blood glucose was measured hourly. Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Friedman test, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests.
RESULTS: A significant reduction in glucose concentration occurred during the first five hours of infusion (p < 0.0001), followed by a stabilization phase with no further significant changes. No differences in glycemic response were found by sex or breed. The protocol was well tolerated, with no hypoglycemic events observed.
CONCLUSIONS: A fixed-dose CRI of 0.05 IU/kg/h offers a safe and effective option for acute glycemic control in diabetic dogs, including those with early ketoacidosis. The standardized approach simplifies management without compromising efficacy and supports its inclusion in emergency treatment protocols.