MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/hep.0000000000000364

Медицинская библиотека · Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2023

Machine learning algorithm improves the detection of NASH (NAS-based) and at-risk NASH: A development and validation study.

Lee Jenny, Westphal Max, Vali Yasaman, Boursier Jerome, Petta Salvatorre, Ostroff Rachel, Alexander Leigh, Chen Yu, Fournier Celine, Geier Andreas, Francque Sven, Wonders Kristy, Tiniakos Dina, Bedossa Pierre, Allison Mike, Papatheodoridis Georgios, Cortez-Pinto Helena, Pais Raluca, Dufour Jean-Francois, Leeming Diana Julie, Harrison Stephen, Cobbold Jeremy, Holleboom Adriaan G, Yki-Järvinen Hannele, Crespo Javier, Ekstedt Mattias, Aithal Guruprasad P, Bugianesi Elisabetta, Romero-Gomez Manuel, Torstenson Richard, Karsdal Morten, Yunis Carla, Schattenberg Jörn M, Schuppan Detlef, Ratziu Vlad, Brass Clifford, Duffin Kevin, Zwinderman Koos, Pavlides Michael, Anstee Quentin M, Bossuyt Patrick M, LITMUS investigators

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Detecting NASH remains challenging, while at-risk NASH (steatohepatitis and F≥ 2) tends to progress and is of interest for drug development and clinical application. We developed prediction models by supervised machine learning techniques, with clinical data and biomarkers to stage and grade patients with NAFLD.

APPROACH AND

RESULTS

Learning data were collected in the Liver Investigation: Testing Marker Utility in Steatohepatitis metacohort (966 biopsy-proven NAFLD adults), staged and graded according to NASH CRN. Conditions of interest were the clinical trial definition of NASH (NAS ≥ 4;53%), at-risk NASH (NASH with F ≥ 2;35%), significant (F ≥ 2;47%), and advanced fibrosis (F ≥ 3;28%). Thirty-five predictors were included. Missing data were handled by multiple imputations. Data were randomly split into training/validation (75/25) sets. A gradient boosting machine was applied to develop 2 models for each condition: clinical versus extended (clinical and biomarkers). Two variants of the NASH and at-risk NASH models were constructed: direct and composite models.Clinical gradient boosting machine models for steatosis/inflammation/ballooning had AUCs of 0.94/0.79/0.72. There were no improvements when biomarkers were included. The direct NASH model produced AUCs (clinical/extended) of 0.61/0.65. The composite NASH model performed significantly better (0.71) for both variants. The composite at-risk NASH model had an AUC of 0.83 (clinical and extended), an improvement over the direct model. Significant fibrosis models had AUCs (clinical/extended) of 0.76/0.78. The extended advanced fibrosis model (0.86) performed significantly better than the clinical version (0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

Detection of NASH and at-risk NASH can be improved by constructing independent machine learning models for each component, using only clinical predictors. Adding biomarkers only improved the accuracy of fibrosis.

Для цитирования: Lee Jenny, Westphal Max, Vali Yasaman, Boursier Jerome, Petta Salvatorre, Ostroff Rachel, Alexander Leigh, Chen Yu, Fournier Celine, Geier Andreas, Francque Sven, Wonders Kristy, Tiniakos Dina, Bedossa Pierre, Allison Mike, Papatheodoridis Georgios, Cortez-Pinto Helena, Pais Raluca, Dufour Jean-Francois, Leeming Diana Julie, Harrison Stephen, Cobbold Jeremy, Holleboom Adriaan G, Yki-Järvinen Hannele, Crespo Javier, Ekstedt Mattias, Aithal Guruprasad P, Bugianesi Elisabetta, Romero-Gomez Manuel, Torstenson Richard, Karsdal Morten, Yunis Carla, Schattenberg Jörn M, Schuppan Detlef, Ratziu Vlad, Brass Clifford, Duffin Kevin, Zwinderman Koos, Pavlides Michael, Anstee Quentin M, Bossuyt Patrick M, LITMUS investigators. Machine learning algorithm improves the detection of NASH (NAS-based) and at-risk NASH: A development and validation study.. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.). 2023. DOI: 10.1097/hep.0000000000000364.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.