MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/13696998.2025.2548741

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of medical economics · 2025

Economic burden of growth hormone deficiency among adults who are at risk for and who have confirmed growth hormone deficiency using US real-world data.

Hoffman Andrew R, Raveendran Subhara, Manjelievskaia Janna, Komirenko Allison S, Winer Isabelle, Cheng Jennifer, Winer-Jones Jessamine P, Bonafede Machaon, Miner Paul, Smith Alden R

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Underdiagnosis and the absence of a condition-specific diagnostic code have made the economic burden of adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) difficult to capture. This study measured all-cause and disease-specific healthcare utilization and costs of AGHD among individuals stratified by diagnosis status and receipt of growth hormone (GH) treatment.

METHODS

Adults meeting ≥1 of the following criteria (1/1/2017-12/31/2021): diagnosis of hypopituitarism or related condition, ≥3 pituitary hormone deficiencies, ≥3 pituitary hormone treatments, or ≥1 GH prescription were identified in the Veradigm Network EHR linked to claims. Individuals were stratified by GH level on or before the earliest qualifying event: confirmed (GH < 3 ng/mL), at-risk (no test result), ruled-out (GH ≥ 3 ng/mL). Confirmed and at-risk individuals were segmented by GH treatment. An age and gender-matched control cohort without AGHD was identified. Healthcare utilization and costs were measured in the 12-month post-index period. Multivariable modeling compared all-cause and AGHD-related healthcare costs, excluding cost of GH, among diagnosis- or treatment status-stratified cohorts while adjusting for baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Among 54,310 individuals at risk for AGHD and 268 with confirmed AGHD, 3.1% and 9.7% received GH treatment, respectively. Study subjects were, on average, 50 years old and majority female. Adjusted all-cause healthcare costs were higher among at-risk individuals (cost ratio [95% confidence interval]: 2.37 [2.26-2.49]) and among confirmed individuals (2.11 [1.52-3.43]) compared to controls. Adjusted annual AGHD-related costs were lower among confirmed individuals compared to at-risk individuals (0.62 [0.52-0.76]) and among treated individuals compared to untreated individuals (0.55 [0.47-0.64]) for those initiating GH therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

All-cause healthcare costs were higher among individuals with confirmed AGHD or at risk for AGHD than among adults without GHD. After excluding the cost of GH therapy, lower adjusted AGHD-related costs were associated with both a confirmed AGHD diagnosis and receipt of GH treatment.

Для цитирования: Hoffman Andrew R, Raveendran Subhara, Manjelievskaia Janna, Komirenko Allison S, Winer Isabelle, Cheng Jennifer, Winer-Jones Jessamine P, Bonafede Machaon, Miner Paul, Smith Alden R. Economic burden of growth hormone deficiency among adults who are at risk for and who have confirmed growth hormone deficiency using US real-world data.. Journal of medical economics. 2025. DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2025.2548741.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.