MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.70200

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2026

Cost Comparison of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Versus Elective Neck Dissection in Early-Stage Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Wu Shannon S, Ayoub Noel F, Chen Michelle M, Finegersh Andrey, Sunwoo John B, Holsinger F Chris, Divi Vasu, Baik Fred M

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Elective neck dissection (END) is the standard treatment for early-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). This study compared costs of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and END from the Medicare payer perspective.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with T1-2N0M0 OCSCC (16 SLNB and 16 END) treated at an academic institution from 2017 to 2025 were included.

RESULTS

32 patients were included: median age 62, 46.9% male, 38% had adjuvant RT. The SLNB cohort had shorter operative time and length-of-stay. Four patients had reoperations: 2 after SLNB (completion neck dissection, tumor re-resection) and 2 after END (neck hematomas). The SLNB cohort had lower costs for postoperative admission ($9567 vs. $12 920, p = 0.015). Total costs were not statistically different ($19 777 vs. $22 126, p = 0.45). On break-even analysis, SLNB with a completion ND rate ≤ 35% had lower costs than END.

CONCLUSIONS

Costs of SLNB were 10.6% less than END, and remained lower with completion ND rates ≤ 35%.

Для цитирования: Wu Shannon S, Ayoub Noel F, Chen Michelle M, Finegersh Andrey, Sunwoo John B, Holsinger F Chris, Divi Vasu, Baik Fred M. Cost Comparison of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Versus Elective Neck Dissection in Early-Stage Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.. Head & neck. 2026. DOI: 10.1002/hed.70200.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.