MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0741-5214(97)70089-2

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of vascular surgery · 1997

Limb asymmetry in titanium Greenfield filters: clinically significant?

Greenfield L J, Proctor M C, Cho K J, Wakefield T W

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the outcomes for patients with titanium Greenfield vena caval filters (TGFs) and, in particular, to evaluate the effect of filter leg distribution on recurrent pulmonary embolism (PE) and caval occlusion.

METHODS

Physical examination, abdominal plain films, and duplex ultrasound examinations of the inferior vena cava and lower extremities were obtained annually and recorded in a Filter Database.

RESULTS

Seven hundred eighty-three TGFs have been placed since 1989. Follow-up was available for 373 patients, or 65% of the surviving patients, over 1 to 84 months (mean, 33 months). Asymmetry was identified in 42 placements (5%), and 35 of these patients had at least one follow-up examination. The overall incidence of recurrent PE was 3.2% (12 of 373), whereas the caval patency rate was 97.8% (265 of 271). These outcomes were not significantly different for patients who had asymmetric filters (p = 0.1 and 0.18, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Filter leg distribution does not appear to be associated with an increased incidence of recurrent PE or caval occlusion. These data support earlier in vitro findings. The long-term results with the TGF are comparable with the results of the original stainless steel Greenfield filter.

Для цитирования: Greenfield L J, Proctor M C, Cho K J, Wakefield T W. Limb asymmetry in titanium Greenfield filters: clinically significant?. Journal of vascular surgery. 1997. DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(97)70089-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.