MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1161/jaha.116.003219

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Heart Association · 2016

Design and Rationale of the Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy for Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI) Trial.

Menard Matthew T, Farber Alik, Assmann Susan F, Choudhry Niteesh K, Conte Michael S, Creager Mark A, Dake Michael D, Jaff Michael R, Kaufman John A, Powell Richard J, Reid Diane M, Siami Flora Sandra, Sopko George, White Christopher J, Rosenfield Kenneth

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеPragmatic Clinical TrialПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is increasing in prevalence, and remains a significant source of mortality and limb loss. The decision to recommend surgical or endovascular revascularization for patients who are candidates for both varies significantly among providers and is driven more by individual preference than scientific evidence.

METHODS AND

RESULTS

The Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy for Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI) Trial is a prospective, randomized, multidisciplinary, controlled, superiority trial designed to compare treatment efficacy, functional outcomes, quality of life, and cost in patients undergoing best endovascular or best open surgical revascularization. Approximately 140 clinical sites in the United States and Canada will enroll 2100 patients with CLI who are candidates for both treatment options. A pragmatic trial design requires consensus on patient eligibility by at least 2 investigators, but leaves the choice of specific procedural strategy within the assigned revascularization approach to the individual treating investigator. Patients with suitable single-segment of saphenous vein available for potential bypass will be randomized within Cohort 1 (n=1620), while patients without will be randomized within Cohort 2 (n=480). The primary efficacy end point of the trial is Major Adverse Limb Event-Free Survival. Key secondary end points include Re-intervention and Amputation-Free-Survival and Amputation Free-Survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The BEST-CLI trial is the first randomized controlled trial comparing endovascular therapy to open surgical bypass in patients with CLI to be carried out in North America. This landmark comparative effectiveness trial aims to provide Level I data to clarify the appropriate role for both treatment strategies and help define an evidence-based standard of care for this challenging patient population.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT02060630.

Для цитирования: Menard Matthew T, Farber Alik, Assmann Susan F, Choudhry Niteesh K, Conte Michael S, Creager Mark A, Dake Michael D, Jaff Michael R, Kaufman John A, Powell Richard J, Reid Diane M, Siami Flora Sandra, Sopko George, White Christopher J, Rosenfield Kenneth. Design and Rationale of the Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy for Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI) Trial.. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2016. DOI: 10.1161/jaha.116.003219.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.