Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2008
Surgery for recurrence of periampullary malignancies.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zacharias Thomas, Oussoultzoglou Elie, Jaeck Daniel, Pessaux Patrick, Bachellier Philippe
Аннотация
AIM: Few studies have addressed the surgical treatment of recurrent disease after pancreatic resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the indications, the short- and long-term outcome, and the prognostic factors impacting survival in patients undergoing a re-laparotomy for recurrence of periampullary malignancies.
METHODS: Between 1990 and 2007, 16 re-laparotomies were performed in 15 patients (one patient had a second re-laparotomy) with a median age of 61 years (range 31-84). Patients were identified from a prospective database and records were reviewed retrospectively.
RESULTS: Seven re-laparotomies were performed for a surgical emergency and nine patients had a re-laparotomy for recurrence found at imaging studies. Perioperative mortality was observed in three patients presenting with surgical emergency and a poor performance status (Eastern Cooporative Oncology Group score >or=3). Perioperative morbidity was 40%. Median survival after the first re-laparotomy for the 15 patients was 7.4 months, and was not different for patients presenting a surgical emergency versus no emergency. Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis had a median survival of 1.4 month. In a univariate analysis of survival, a performance status of ECOG score >or=2 and a pre-operative hemoglobin level <12 g/dl were predictors of poor survival.
CONCLUSION: In selected patients, a re-laparotomy for recurrence of periampullary malignancies is feasible. Peritoneal recurrence was not a good indication for surgery. The predictors of poor survival after the re-laparotomy were a poor performance status and a low preoperative hemoglobin level.
METHODS: Between 1990 and 2007, 16 re-laparotomies were performed in 15 patients (one patient had a second re-laparotomy) with a median age of 61 years (range 31-84). Patients were identified from a prospective database and records were reviewed retrospectively.
RESULTS: Seven re-laparotomies were performed for a surgical emergency and nine patients had a re-laparotomy for recurrence found at imaging studies. Perioperative mortality was observed in three patients presenting with surgical emergency and a poor performance status (Eastern Cooporative Oncology Group score >or=3). Perioperative morbidity was 40%. Median survival after the first re-laparotomy for the 15 patients was 7.4 months, and was not different for patients presenting a surgical emergency versus no emergency. Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis had a median survival of 1.4 month. In a univariate analysis of survival, a performance status of ECOG score >or=2 and a pre-operative hemoglobin level <12 g/dl were predictors of poor survival.
CONCLUSION: In selected patients, a re-laparotomy for recurrence of periampullary malignancies is feasible. Peritoneal recurrence was not a good indication for surgery. The predictors of poor survival after the re-laparotomy were a poor performance status and a low preoperative hemoglobin level.